Re: Problem with GPG

2011-08-09 Thread lists . gnupg-users
Hello Werner, Yesterday, Aug 8, Werner Koch wrote to lists.gnupg-us...@duinheks.nl about...: WK > You should better use WK > gpg --batch --sign --armour --clearsig --passphrase-fd 0 --yes -o "$1".asc "$1" I will do that in future. WK > to avoid the mv. Even better use gpg-agent. That will t

Problem with GPG

2011-08-08 Thread lists . gnupg-users
Hello, I call PGP from Pine with a simple script: #!/bin/sh echo "" | /usr/bin/gpg --batch --sign --armour --clearsig --passphrase-fd 0 $1 mv $1.asc $2 Lately I noticed that it did not work, withour giving me any warning. When I use it 'by hand' I see an error: echo "xxx

Re: Help with OpenPGP plugin in Mozilla Thunderbird and Claws Mail

2011-02-16 Thread Lists . gnupg-users
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:38:47AM -0800 Also sprach AgoristTeen1994: > > Okay thanks for the help though I'm still somewhat confused...I understand > that they key id is the entire keypair, but then how do I found out what is > just my public key, and just my secret key, the reason I"m asking is

Re: very short plaintexts symmetrically encrypted

2010-01-11 Thread lists . gnupg-users
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:02 +0100, "Werner Koch" wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:44:35 -0500, ved...@hush.com wrote: > > > symmetrical encryption is a simple way to avoid signing, while > > still maintaining relative reliability of knowledge as to who sent > > the message > > That is not true.