On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 05:42:10PM +0200, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 31/05/17 14:52, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Right to be forgotten. The signatures I made a long time ago were made
>> by a different person, although there is a continuity between the
>> two.
> Talking a
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 10:45:02AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 10/4/2010 8:22 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Also, when my signature subkey expires, it would (I guess) silently
>> start using the primary. Which makes me_very_ happy I chose to make
>> my primary certif
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:07:31PM +, Charles Spitzer wrote:
> Is there a GnuPGP project anywhere that does PGP encryption that is
> usable in a C# application? I know I can execute commands at a
> command line to do this, but that would require the plaintext to
> reside on disk somewhere and
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 01:03:00AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 04:46:46PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 09:35:50PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> You could argue I could have this without marking the key as
>>>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 05:14:04PM +0200, Jan Suhr wrote:
> For my understanding GnuPG is standard conform and creates a "DSA
> primary key (1024 bits - not "DSA2") with an Elgamal subkey per
> default."
> It was discussed in May to change this standard to 2048-bit RSA key:
> http://www.imc.org/i
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 07:25:46AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 12:33:03AM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> I still don't understand why you use PKCS#1, PKCS#8, X.509, CMC,
>> S/MIME and more... Why don't you invent some replacements for thes
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:54:13PM -0500, Nicholas Sushkin wrote:
> On Sunday 19 February 2006 01:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 12:33:03AM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>> I still don't understand why you use PKCS#1, PKCS#8, X.509, CMC,
>>> S/MIME and more... Why don't you
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 12:33:03AM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> I still don't understand why you use PKCS#1, PKCS#8, X.509, CMC,
> S/MIME and more... Why don't you invent some replacements for these
> too?
Big news for you: We are here precisely because we prefer OpenPGP to
S/MIME. And *I* certai
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:11:59PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> Yeah, we are using Subversion for quite some time now.
But http://www.gnupg.org/(en)/download/cvs_access.html is still there,
linked from http://www.gnupg.org/, and giving false information under
the seal of "official".
Please update
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 01:59:57PM +1030, Alphax wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> I'm trying to generate an authentication subkey (tied to my main
>> OpenPGP key) in my OpenPGP (FSFE Fellowship) smartcard (for poldi /
>> SSH use), but can't get it to work
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 07:50:17PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> I'm trying to generate an authentication subkey (tied to my main
> OpenPGP key) in my OpenPGP (FSFE Fellowship) smartcard (for poldi /
> SSH use), but can't get it to work. gpg --edit-card and --card-status
&
Hi,
I'm trying to generate an authentication subkey (tied to my main
OpenPGP key) in my OpenPGP (FSFE Fellowship) smartcard (for poldi /
SSH use), but can't get it to work. gpg --edit-card and --card-status
works like a charm.
Command> addcardkey
gpg: detected reader `SCM SCR 335 (60600ad9) 00 0
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 07:50:17PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to generate an authentication subkey (tied to my main
> OpenPGP key) in my OpenPGP (FSFE Fellowship) smartcard (for poldi /
> SSH use), but can't get it to work. gpg --edit-card and -
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:10:26PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> As you probably know, one can set his prefered algorithms for a OpenPGP
> key using setpref.
> How is the priority specified? Is it from left to right, meaning that an
> algorithm a left from another (b) is preferd in f
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 12:36:13AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> What about the two big "free" X.509" suppliers (CACert and Thawte)
> do they sign OpenPGP keys?
Thawte used to, but doesn't anymore. CACert does.
--
Lionel
___
Gnupg-users ma
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:41:17AM -0700, amit bhalerao wrote:
> Is there any way i can validate that decryption process has been
> successful base on error code? Do you have any document which list
> down possible error code and cause of failure.
Use --status-fd and read doc/DETAILS in t
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:02:52PM -0700, amit bhalerao wrote:
> I want to decrypt a gpg encrypted document using a GPG. Is there
> any way i can decrypt it in a non -interactive mode so that it
> doesn't ask for passphrase.I want to execute the command in shell
> script.
> Any pointer t
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:21:57PM -0400, Jason Barrett wrote:
> I am using GPG for encryption of sensitive information in a
> database. Some members of the development team are concerned about
> the space taken up by strings encrypted with 1024-bit keys
You may want to look into elliptic curves
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 11:57:21PM +0400, lusfert wrote:
> Also I didn't understand how to set up preferences for a key:
> allowed and preferred ciphers, digest algorithms and compress
> methods. It is possible to set up them using PGP Desktop 9.
gpg --edit-key 0xKeyID
setpref "the preferences yo
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:25:02AM +0200, Laurent Jumet wrote:
> Is this signature on the message, a PGP2 one?
You made this signature with a DSS key. You "must" use an RSAv3 key to
do PGP2-compatible signatures, I believe. Where PGP2 is the "official"
version. And use MD5, not SHA1.
--
Lio
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 01:59:17AM +0200, Laurent Jumet wrote:
> Johan Wevers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On my system, --pgp2 doesn't work.
> The FAQ says --rfc1991 should be used instead, and this works.
> This message should be signed in a PGP2-compliant way.
To encrypt / sign in
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 01:59:17AM +0200, Laurent Jumet wrote:
> > Johan Wevers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On my system, --pgp2 doesn't work.
> > The FAQ says --rfc1991 sho
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:01:14PM -0700, amit bhalerao wrote:
> 1. We are generating a public private key on HOST system using GPG .
> 2. This keys are exported to external vendor system. Vendor will be
> encrypting the file using PGP (not sure about compatibilty)
> 3. Files are then decrypted
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 01:13:02PM +0200, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
> PS> The whole discussion made me curious; I worked with smartcards
> extensively few years ago and was grossly disappointed with the stuff from
> the development side, but times they are a'changin... Where can I purchase a
> c
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:52:55PM +0200, Zeljko Vrba wrote:
> 'Lionel Elie Mamane' wrote:
>> 1) Pointers being passed
>>By copying the whole address space back and forth at each call and
>>return? "Morally" that's not running in separate a
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:52:55PM +0200, Zeljko Vrba wrote:
> 'Lionel Elie Mamane' wrote:
>>Please do so. I'm curious how you will handle:
>>
>> 1) Pointers being passed
>>
>>By copying the whole address space back and forth at each call a
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 02:48:33PM +0200, Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
> Forgive my ignorance but how do I select a subkey?
I'm not sure what you mean. In the "--edit-key" menu, you type "key
n", replacing "n" by a number. From the command line, you "just" use
the KeyID of the key.
--
Lionel
_
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:26:05PM +0200, Zeljko Vrba wrote:
>> PKCS#11 IS a library API. But really, how is API different from a
>> protocol? Is the only difference linking in the same address space?
> BTW, I can imagine writing a version of ld.so (BSD licensed!) that
> will execute different sh
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:04:28PM +0200, Zeljko Vrba wrote:
> 'Lionel Elie Mamane' wrote:
>>I had understood that it was not a _protocol_ but a library API. HTTP
>>is a _protocol_ for data interchange over the network. I thought
>>PKCS#11 was a _library_ API and
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:09:25AM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> But there is indeed a case to be made that if the library
>> implements a well-known, standard ABI, then linking to it is not a
>> GPL violation. Legally it depends whether the l
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 01:53:18AM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 6. September 2005 01:31 schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane:
>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:26:40PM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>>> Im using kubuntu and so kmail with gnupg.
>>> When I send an enc
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 03:14:56PM +1200, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:14:41PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>> Since your GPLed program does not contain any other licensed code it is
>>> stil
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:26:40PM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Im using kubuntu and so kmail with gnupg.
> When I send an encrypted mail to win user who has pgp the encrypted mail is
> attached.
> 1.) Why this message is attached and pgp is not able to decrypt it?
> I have to save it first an
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 12:59:48AM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane Wrote:
>> Not unless that PKCS#11 module "is normally distributed with the
>> major components of the operating system". (Assuming here that the
>> PKCS#11 module would is a library
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 04:46:46PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 09:35:50PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 01:46:07PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
>>> It's not necessarily a good idea though: some people before agreeing
>>
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:14:41PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Zeljko Vrba wrote:
>> Neither do I understand that. Werner didn't give a single plausible
>> argument except possibly of license incompatibility. But in my
>> understanding, just incorporating PKCS#11 support into GnuPG would
>> NOT
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 01:46:07PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 04:41:40PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> I tried to generate an RSAv4 certification-only key with GnuPG, but
>> failed, even in "expert mode".
>> Is this impossible with Gnu
Hi,
I tried to generate an RSAv4 certification-only key with GnuPG, but
failed, even in "expert mode".
What I mean is a primary key that can be used to attach a subkey to
it, or _maybe_ also to sign UserIDs of other keys (for the Web of
Trust). But not for data signatures. As I understand the RFC
38 matches
Mail list logo
