Hi,
I downloaded the latest GpgME version and called configure.
The last lines it outputes are:
configure: WARNING:
***
*** ttyname() is not thread-safe and ttyname_r() does not exist
***
checking whether we are using the GNU C Library 2.1 or newer... no
checking for getenv_r... no
configure: WAR
Not sure:
PKI - Public Key Infrastructure
PKA - Public Key Application ?
HTH
--esskar
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pawel Shajdo
> Sent: Dienstag, 27. Dezember 2005 01:44
> To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> Subject: PKA
>
>
> Salve!
>
Hi.
I'm i right:
We calculate the salted hash d of the password p and the salt s using the
hash-function H like this:
d = H( p + s ) + s
This will have the affect that d != H( p + s' ) + s' (only if s != s') but
will not protect us against a dictionary attack since
we can easily precompute H( w
Well, i do not know about files, but our product signs mails using
multiple-signatures (at least two signatures are required before a mail
leaves the system).
So i think it is NOT a bad feature.
Regards,
Sascha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] O
Well,
I thought about a makro or something similar.
But thanks anyway!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John W. Moore III
> Sent: Dienstag, 5. Juli 2005 20:32
> To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> Subject: Re: Outlook & S/MIME
>
>
> -BE
Well, the person does not have a public key in the first place.
But outlook does not know that in advance. After clicking on "Send"
an error is raised that the mail can not be send encrypted because
of the missing public key. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[E
Hi.
Well, i think you have to trust the key somehow by default,
Or try using the option "--always-trust"
HTH
--sk
> I have not seen any responses. But I have an add'l question:
> after importing, and verifying is it required to sign the new
> key prior to encrypting?
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not aware of that.
Are u using mutt?
May u send me a signed, encrypted and your public key so i can get the idea?
Regards,
Sascha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alain Bench
> Sent
Thanks.
I use a similar approaches...
I just finished (more less) the part yesterday where the body is text/html
only and does not have
an alternative text/plain.
What i figuered that you can pipe any content (encrypted or/and signed) to
gnupg
using the option --decrypt and it will verify and/or de
> Possibly the confusion is that RFC-2015 was updated by
> RFC-3156. You should do things the 3156 way.
>
> David
Well, as far as i see there is no difference between the MIME format of
rfc2015 and rfc3156.
So, what is right?
RFC like:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5
pro
Signing
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 10:42:51AM +0200, Kiefer, Sascha wrote:
> > Hmm.
> > I just implemented RFC2015 3 days ago.
> > The format of PGP/MIME described in that paper does not match the
> > format you are using. Your mails start with a Content-Type
rsign vs. PGP/MIME Signing
>
>
> Kiefer, Sascha wrote:
>
> >Hmm.
> >I just implemented RFC2015 3 days ago.
> >The format of PGP/MIME described in that paper does not match the
> >format you are using. Your mails start with a Content-Type of
> >multipa
Hmm.
I just implemented RFC2015 3 days ago.
The format of PGP/MIME described in that paper does not match the format
you are using.
Your mails start with a Content-Type of multipart/mixed and you declare
The pgp data as attachments. But this is not true.
Maybe I'm missing something, or your message
> "At least". Does the bank has contracted anyone with enough
> knowledge of cryptography to make educated assumptions about
> the strength of the different algorithms in GnuPG?
Hopefully! :)
But i think, it's not the boss of the bank that will change those
Settings but the security administrat
> Yes, but this is a bad mistake to make. If an algorithm does
> not appear in someones preferences, then it shouldn't be
> used. For example, IDEA is an optional algorithm in OpenPGP.
> If your administrator decides that everyone should use IDEA,
> that will mean that some users will not be
> Yes, you will.
>
> However, why are you doing this? GnuPG automatically does
> this for you.
Not really. Only if i change the pref for the key i use.
My system is similar to the PGP universal system which runs on a server.
Let's think about SHA-1. Right now, it will be the preferred hash alg
> > 3. Will i get more than that "uid:uSascha Kiefer (test4711)
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>1,:" information if i do not have a private
> > key?
>
> I'm not sure what you're asking here.
Well, i have an automated system where you are able to define some policies
e.g. use just AES256 for
Hi
I have same questions!
1. what is the difference between showpef and pref using the option
"--with-colons" ?
2. S9 S8 S7 S3 S2 H2 H3 Z2 Z1: S=symmetric, H=hash, Z=compression? H3 means
RIPEMD160 because "gpg.exe --version" tells me that
the hashing algorithms that are supported are MD5, SHA1,
Hi.
I just found this website: http://www.hanewin.de/encrypt/main.htm
I think it's pretty nice.
Would do you think about it?
--sk
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Go for it!
> BTW, to avoid answering these questions over and over, should
> we just setup working keyservers under the gnupg.net domain?
> It seems the old and broken pgp.net servers will never vanish.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnup
I just had a look on the source to get an idee of gathering entropy.
I noticed the following:
Line 660-664:
(*add) ( &minimumWorkingSetSize,
sizeof (&minimumWorkingSetSize), requester );
(*add) ( &maximumWorkingSetSize,
sizeof (&maximumWorkingSetSize), reques
Well,
It would be nice to have a control to select the keyring location.
I keep my keys on a memory stick, so i'm not able to use your tool!
--esskar
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Fitzner
> Sent: Montag, 21. März 2005 23:19
>
Well, i use a c++ program to do the same (using CreateProcess and
redirecting STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR)
My code is
STARTUPINFO si;
BOOL result;
memset(&si, 0, sizeof(si));
si.cb = sizeof(si);
si.dwFlags = STARTF_USESTDHANDLES | STARTF_USESHOWWINDOW;
si.hStdInput = m_childstdinrd;
si.hStdOutput =
23 matches
Mail list logo
