Hi everybody,
On some keys, gpgme returns a 0 bytes for the signature summary, with no
errors. The signs are ok in my tests
Is it a bug ? It should return
GPGME_SIGSUM_VALID = 0x0001
shouldn't it ?
Does someone know why the flag hasn't been setted ?
Thanks in advance,
Joss
__
Yes but you're supposed to pay to use ressource on a cloud system arn't you
? Is it usable computing for free ?
2009/11/4 David Shaw
> http://news.electricalchemy.net/2009/10/cracking-passwords-in-cloud.html
>
> This is not, of course, an OpenPGP "crack", but rather high-speed password
> guessin
y default on my
system (archlinux)
Bye
2009/10/23 Josselin Jacquard
> I've working on my problem, and the data allocation seem solved. (Or maybe
> it never appeared and I misjudge the debug info)
>
> Now it's the gpg engine which throws a no data error. I've got th
me_io_set_nonblocking (fd=0xc): enter
_gpgme_io_set_nonblocking (fd=0xc): leave: result=0
gpgme:gpg_io_event (gpg=0xa2a6318): call: event 0xb7e6bb9c, type 0,
type_data (nil)
2009/10/22 Josselin Jacquard
> Hi,
> I've got a bug and I can't find the solution.
>
> I'm ca
Hi,
I've got a bug and I can't find the solution.
I'm calling gpgme_op_verify with a non empty signature and a non empty plain
text, but the gpgme returns a no data error.
It looks like when debugging that the _gpgme_op_data_lookup return this
error (called by _gpgme_op_verify_init_result)
The l
