Although I got a solution for the initial problem to use gpgv, I am still
curious why all the other methods fail.
Any ideas?
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 12:15:18AM +0100, Josef Wolf wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to verify signature of downloaded files when creating a docker
> con
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 09:57:24AM +, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 30 Jan 2025, at 23:15, Josef Wolf wrote:
> >
> > I am trying to verify signature of downloaded files when creating a docker
> > container. This is what I am trying to do within the Dockerfile:
>
>
N gpg --verify --trust-model always
ql/quicklisp.lisp.asc ql/quicklisp.lisp": while running runtime: exit status 2
BTW: I create an empty ~/.gnupg directory before the very first gpg invocation
to prevent use-keyboxd option to be set.
Does it really need to be that hard to verify signature wi
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 02:13:17AM +0200, Josef Wolf wrote:
> I am wondering what this error message
>
>WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir `/usr/local/etc/backup'
>
> is trying to tell me.
>
> This directory is owned by root:myself and has mode 750. So it is
&
Hello,
I am wondering what this error message
WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir `/usr/local/etc/backup'
is trying to tell me.
This directory is owned by root:myself and has mode 750. So it is
writable only by root and readable only by myself and by root.
AFAICS, it is as safe as it can g
s, chances are that you
keep answering the wrong questions. (just kidding :)
> Josef Wolf wrote:
> >>> Don't most unices have /dev/random nowadays? I never planned to
> >>> run this thing on a windows box :)
> >>
> >> GnuPG has been ported to many p
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 03:05:08PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 08:42:39PM +0200, Josef Wolf wrote:
>
> > AFAIK, having random_seed be accessible to unauthorized people is
> > not acceptable. Thus I have no choice, I just _have_ to use the
> > --no
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 05:28:25PM -0500, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Josef Wolf wrote:
> > Don't most unices have /dev/random nowadays? I never planned to run
> > this thing on a windows box :)
> GnuPG has been ported to many platforms. BeOS, OpenVMS, Win32, and many
&
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 03:27:59PM -0500, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Josef Wolf wrote:
> 1. /dev/random isn't available on all platforms. GnuPG's random number
> generator is.
Don't most unices have /dev/random nowadays? I never planned to run this
thing on a wi
Thanks for your response, Robert!
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 05:36:33PM -0500, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Josef Wolf wrote:
> > 1. It locks the keyring. --lock-never will avoid this. Is it safe
> > to use --lock-never as long as it is guaranteed that _only_ "gpg -e"
Hello!
I need a setup where the user running "gpg -e -r foobar" is not able to
modify keyring contents. I tried:
# chown -R root:user ~user/.gnupg
# chmod -R o=rwX,g=rX,o= ~user/.gnupg
Unfortunately, this don't work because gpg does some write operations
in its .gnupg directory:
1. It
Hello!
I need a setup where the user running "gpg -e -r foobar" is not able to
modify keyring contents. I tried:
# chown -R root:user ~user/.gnupg
# chmod -R o=rwX,g=rX,o= ~user/.gnupg
Unfortunately, this don't work because gpg does some write operations
in its .gnupg directory:
1. It
12 matches
Mail list logo
