Re: fetch yields "rejected by import filter"

2017-01-08 Thread Jorgen Ottosson
Hi, > So what happens when you invoke > > $ gpg2 -v --fetch-key [URL]? > > Or for even more verbosity, do -vv. > > HTH, > > Peter. Well, that does work, after I put URL in quotes ("URL"), otherwise it does not. Maybe the 'fetch' command in card-edit/admin is more picky about what URLs actually wo

fetch yields "rejected by import filter"

2017-01-08 Thread Jorgen Ottosson
Hi, I'm having problems importing and thereafter using keys on another pc. This is kinda annoying since it interfers with using cards smoothly on different computers. I have the privkey on a card, use the admin/fetch command to get the pubkey down and therafter use the card-status to generate the

Re: Problems with 4096 keys on 2.1 card

2016-01-27 Thread Jorgen Ottosson
>> $ gpg2 --card-status >> gpg: selecting openpgp failed: Unsupported certificate > > That is an interesting error message because that one is only used by > gpgsm and not by any components involved in gpg2 --card-status. Please > enter > > gpg-connect-agent -v > > and on its prompt > > SCD GE

Re: Problems with 4096 keys on 2.1 card

2016-01-26 Thread Jorgen Ottosson
Thanks to you both for commenting on this, I do remember the 335 being one of the most original readers to work without much hazzle. > Please note that GnuPG 1.4 supports up to 3072-bit. This is because > of internal library limitation. > > I believe that "gpg" in Ubuntu is GnuPG 1.4. It is "gp

Re: Problems with 4096 keys on 2.1 card

2016-01-25 Thread Jorgen Ottosson
On 25 Jan 2016 at 21:07, NIIBE Yutaka wrote: > However, please note that many card readers have problems with larger > APDU. Generating keys on card should be ok, but importing keys would > be failed with bad reader. Signing should be ok, but decryption would > be failed with bad reader. That's

Problems with 4096 keys on 2.1 card

2016-01-25 Thread Jorgen Ottosson
Hi, I've been having some problems using a GPG card 2.1 with Ubuntu repo GPG, think it was 2.0.22. I noticed some discussions in Sept-15 about this and got the impression that it should work. Can someone just make a short comment on this, should a 2.0.22 be able to generate 4096 keys and/or impo