<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it doesn't deal with a potentially more difficult situation :
proving you signed something,
to someone whom you would prefer it 'not' proved to ;-((
Encrypt and then sign does not have this problem, unless the other person is
will
"Henk M. de Bruijn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 25 May 2006 23:17:46 -0400GMT (26-5-2006, 5:17 +0200, where I
live), Joe Smith wrote:
"Henk M. de Bruijn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is
"Henk M. de Bruijn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Is it allowed to ask this question here or??
Don't bother to ask if you are allowed to ask, simply ask.
If you are having a problem, and it is due to GPG then this
"David Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi David,
Thanks for the info, even if it's not what I wanted to hear. :-)
What do you mean by "raw Rijndael"?
The C# code that the software house are using is shown below, even if
I clone this program am I likely to b
"Werner Koch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 14 Mar 2006 20:07:21 +0100, Dennis Heitmann said:
gpg: pcsc_transmit failed: not transacted (0x80100016)
gpg: apdu_send_simple(0) failed: card I/O error
That is a catch all error of thye underlying ifd-handler. I
"Maria Lukas van den Berg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following post is based on my understanding. I think I'm correct,
but it is possible I am wrong.
Assume that I create a keypair A and sign my Usenet postings
using A. I do not want to rely on any signa
And since it works with Mozilla, I suspect your banking card is using a
X.509 certificate not a PGP key.
Probably. However, I still need to sign mails with this smartcard, so is
there
still a way to use this card with the X.509 certificates with kmail /
gnupg?
For official documents I'll so
"Werner Koch" wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:19:47 +0100, websites said:
Is it possible to tell gpg to only decrypt signed files?
--skip-verify
I parsed that question as the same as the last one, namely decrypt the file
if it is signed, don't if it is not.
You apparently read it as: decry
"Christoph Anton Mitterer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi.
When I use an USB token instead of a "normal" smartcard reader do I
still need special software (e.g. pcscd and so on) or is gnupg enough.
You still need to use special software.
A cyrpto token is just
"Zeljko Vrba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMHO, PKCS#11 has succeeded where ISO7816 has failed: providing a
(relatively) simple way to interface with many smart-card
implementations, many of which aren't ISO7816-compliant above level 3 -
they even don't support
"Benjamin Donnachie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Joe Smith wrote:
There is no need to post a message to the list three times.
I didn't. I posted it to gnupg-users and -devel as I felt my enqui
There is no need to post a message to the list three times.
Is it possible to obtain further details on the OpenPGP card?
I have such a card and a working smartcard reader but, ideally, I'd like to
obtain copies of the sourcecode and program my own cards. However, it's
extremely difficult to t
"Rex Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone else seeing this with gnupg2-1.9.18:
$gpgkey2ssh
gpgkey2ssh: gpgkey2ssh.c:255: main: Assertion `argc == 2' failed.
Does the same on all platforms I've built for, including RedHat 9, Fedora
Core 4, RedHat Enterpri
Be careful with this. First of all both the second and third packet can be
implemented as the first packet type. Second encouraging users to place
extra data into theie keys is just asking for problem. Imaginge when
somebody decides to attaches a 50 MiB mpeg to their key, and uploads it to
the
Open Message to Werner Koch:
The OpenPGP Smartcard page says a FAQ is in production. While I'm pretty
sure you can come up with enough questions, I pose the following questions
which have occurred to me, and in the cases where I was able to make a
decent sounding response, I have included an a
All that said, the bottom line is that if the source is random, the
armor is too.
He was speaking especially of encypted output which is theoretically near
random, so it is fairly secure. If the password must be long, reproducable,
and reasonably secure, using ascii-amoured output of encrypt
What about:
"
echo SOME DATA HERE|gpg ...
"
This is not valid using just the standard execution methods under windows
IIRC, but if you are using the cmd.exe shell it should work.
'echo' is a shell builtin.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@g
17 matches
Mail list logo
