Hans Ekbrand wrote:
[..]
> I don't want to sign these keys myself, since I haven't checked the
> validity of them. I belive in the validity of them, but I would not to
> vouch for it.
There is a very simple way to solve all of this: Get enough signatures
so that your key is in the strong set. This
Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:44:29 +0300, Pawel Shajdo said:
>
>> What is PKA? Just have found in manual unknown words...
>
> Public Key Association
>
> Yeah, I know that I should write a paper on this. There is only a
> simplepresentation on what PKA tries to solve
> (ftp://ftp.
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 15:10 +, cdr wrote:
> Werner Koch wrote:
>
> > Please write in English here...
>
> It is unnecessarily rude to demand that a particular language is
> used on any 'net list. One writing in a language not understood
> by the majority of those present will simply get fewer
Werner Koch wrote:
> gpg -s [EMAIL PROTECTED]@example.org foo
This parts looks good...
> gpg detects that foo.gpg has the notation key pka-address at gnupg.org
> and takes its value (werner at example.org) to run a DNS query like:
>
> $ host -t txt werner._pka.example.org
> werner._pka.ex
