On 1/5/21 8:24 AM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:27:14AM -0500, Jean-David Beyer via Gnupg-users
wrote:
Building a web of trust is so hopeless, from my point of view, that I have
abandonned gnupg. I have made keys for myself, obtained enigmail for my
Firefox browser
On 1/4/21 9:31 PM, ï¿œngel wrote:
Finally, every user will need to discard their now-useless keys,
generate new ones and rebuild the chain of turst from the ground up.
Building a web of trust is so hopeless, from my point of view, that I
have abandonned gnupg. I have made keys for myself, obta
On 10/7/19 9:32 AM, Phillip Susi wrote:
> Bingo! And as long as the user is not interested in it, and won't learn
> how to properly use it, all they will get is the veneer of privacy and
> learn the hard way that they really aren't secure. You just can't make
> security idiot proof.
I had a real
On 4/6/19 12:32 PM, Markus Reichelt wrote:
> i'm using on slackware64-current (if you are using windows, all hands
> are off)
>
> gpg --version
> gpg (GnuPG) 2.2.15
> libgcrypt 1.8.4
Mine's bigger than yours (older, too):
$ gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.14
libgcrypt 1.4.5
Copyright (C) 2009 Free