On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:12:41 -0500GMT (24-3-2005, 5:12 +0100, where I
live), David Shaw wrote:
...
>>> You get the error when you *send* a message, or when you *verify* a
>>> message?
>> Not while sending, but when I verify a message.
>>
>>> What happens if you remove the 'digest-algo RIPEMD160
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:33:18 -0500GMT (24-3-2005, 3:33 +0100, where I
live), David Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:21:08AM +0100, Henk de Bruijn wrote:
>> Sorry for not telling relevant information. As you can see in my
>> signature I am using The Bat! Further I use G
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:08:19 -0500GMT (23-3-2005, 21:08 +0100, where I
live), David Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:02:27PM +0100, Henk de Bruijn wrote:
>> I changed the digest algo from SHA1 to RIPEMD160
> This does not tell me anything useful. I don't know what
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:51:59 -0500GMT (23-3-2005, 20:51 +0100, where I
live), David Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:29:21PM +0100, Henk de Bruijn wrote:
>> When I verified one of my own messages which had been signed pgp/mime
>> I got this errormessage:
>>
>>
Hi,
When I verified one of my own messages which had been signed pgp/mime
I got this errormessage:
gpg: Signature made 03/23/05 12:16:08 using DSA key ID DBE6E678
gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
gpg: Can't check signature: general error
I checked my messages of the last couple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:53:36 +0100GMT (15-3-2005, 17:53 +0100, where I
live), Werner Koch wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG
> release: Version 1.4.1
Thank you, up and running!
- --
Henk
__
