gt; near future?
>
> No. There's some talk about supporting it, but as far as I know there's
> no plan to do it. It's still at the "you know, it'd be kind of nice
> if..." stage, not the "we really should do this" stage.
Double nice.
Time to
key management and crypto happen in the same process as IMAP/POP/SMTP,
GUI, JavaScript and everything else? If so - do you believe it's acceptable?
2. Is there any real plan to have working smartcard support in the near future?
--
Grzegorz Kulewski
__
and signing key.
7. If you want something stronger than Curve 25519 that (is believed to) share
similar benefits try Curve 448 (~224 bits of security). But I am not sure if
PGP implements it (yet?).
--
Grzegorz Kulewski
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ished such benchmarks independently.
Does anybody here have Curve25519 enabled Yubikey and did/could do such
benchmarks?
Thank you in advance!
--
Grzegorz Kulewski
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/list
instead of requiring user to
enter them using pinentry.
I wonder what method of integration of GPG with such project is best, most
future-proof and recommended and are there any other advices you may give me?
Thank you in advance.
--
Grzegor