On Mar 13, 2012 4:37 PM, "Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
>
> > RSA is not an encryption algorithm. RSA is a means of exchanging
> > keys.
>
> You may be thinking of the Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange Algorithm
> (DHKEA). You're not thinking of RSA, though: RSA unquestionably is an
> encryption algorithm.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:02, jpemail2001-...@yahoo.com <
jpemail2001-...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >If you choose to use someone's public certificate to encrypt a message,
> >they use the private part of that certificate to decrypt it -- different
> >things for encryption and decryption, thus a differ
On Mar 13, 2012 8:15 AM, "Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
>
> On 3/13/2012 7:09 AM, Eric Christensen wrote:
> > Because this is symmetric encryption. You would need to sign the data
> > to get integrity protection.
>
> This isn't quite right. He's getting
On Mar 13, 2012 6:23 AM, "jpemail2001-...@yahoo.com" <
jpemail2001-...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> gpg: CAST5 encrypted data
> gpg: encrypted with 1 passphrase
> Test message
> gpg: WARNING: message was not integrity protected
>
-
