Re: [Announce] GnuPG 2.1.17 released

Hello, Am 20.12.2016 um 13:46 schrieb Christoph Moench-Tegeder: > SHA1 (gnupg-2.1.17.tar.bz2) = d83ab893faab35f37ace772ca29b939e6a5aa6a7 > SHA1 (gnupg-2.1.17.tar.bz2.sig) = 34cea3e6d139cb340bf14f04ff217cb6960cf36d > > Or is that just me and a local issue? it works for me (see below), but the sig-

Re: How to interprete the output of --export-ownertrust?

Hello, Am 05.04.2016 um 06:37 schrieb Doug Barton: > I learned to check the headers, and look for References: (sometimes > spelled In-Reply-To:) with one or more message Ids after. while it is off-topic: The In-Reply-to and References-header are not the same. The in-reply-to-header tells you, for

Re: character encoding differs in gpg and gpg2

Hello, Am 16.12.2015 um 11:51 schrieb Fabian Stäber: > My name has a special character. 'gpg --edit-key' shows it correctly, > 'gpg2 --edit-key' does not. either gpg or gpg2 show the umlaut in your key correct here. My locale is LC_ALL=de_DE.UTF-8. Sincerely, DaB. signature.asc Description

Re: GnuPG 2.1: --auto-key-locate dane

Hallo, Am 27.11.2015 um 07:58 schrieb Werner Koch: >> The OpenPGPKey-DNS-entry for my mail-adress works, if you like to test gpg. > Not for me: sorry, this is a misunderstanding. I meant: My entry is correct in the DNS, while Felix’ is not. I have no such recent version of gpg to test if it is wor

Re: GnuPG 2.1: --auto-key-locate dane

Hello, Am 26.11.2015 um 16:00 schrieb Felix Seip: > Clearly I am doing something wrong and was wondering if someone could > help me with this problem. Hello, Am 26.11.2015 um 16:00 schrieb Felix Seip: > Clearly I am doing something wrong and was wondering if someone could > help me with this probl

Re: Trusting other keys a message was encrypted to

Hello, Am 07.11.2015 um 12:10 schrieb MFPA: > But we *could* check to see if any of them gives > us cause for concern. I don’t really understand what is the earn here. If I send a encrypted message to you and EvilPerson (together in the same eMail), you receive the email and gpg would warn you “

Re: TOFU for GnuPG

Hello, Am 29.10.2015 um 15:06 schrieb Neal H. Walfield: > First, some > statistics are displayed, namely, that we've verified 5 messages > signed by this key in the past last hour. isn’t it a little bit problematic that GPG now logs how often I received emails by someone else? Sincerely, DaB.

Re: Generating 4096 bit key fails – why?

Hello, Am 27.10.2015 um 11:11 schrieb Felix E. Klee: > As already mentioned in the October 2015 thread “Bad secret key” on > , I cannot generate a 4096 bit on > my [OpenPGP card][1]. What could be the issue? AFAIK the card doesn’t support 4096 bit keys. The webpage given by you says the same AFAIS

Re: Proposal of OpenPGP Email Validation

Hello, Am 27.07.2015 um 14:15 schrieb Neal H. Walfield: > This approach is not going to stop a nation state. A nation state can > intercept the mail, decrypt it and follow the link. > > For the same reason, it is not going to stop a user's ISP. Given > Microsoft's et al.'s willingness to coopera

Re: Receiving keys by PKA or OpenPGP

Hello, Am 15.05.2015 um 13:33 schrieb Werner Koch: > gpg2 --auto-key-locate clear,nodefault,pka --locate-key ADDRESS ah ok, thanks. I forgot to consult the man-page for gpg2, sorry. Sincerely, DaB. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.or

Re: What Linux kernel configuration options are required by GPG for --refresh-keys?

Hello, Am 15.05.2015 um 16:20 schrieb Daniel Bomar: > If I ping either of those hostnames it sends only an A query that’s normal, because the ping-command works only for IPv4. Sincerely, DaB. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http:

Receiving keys by PKA or OpenPGP

Hello, maybe I’m blind, but how can I receive a key from a pka- or OpenPGP-DNS-entry without encrypting a (dummy-)file? Sincerely, DaB. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users