Thanks for your advice all... i will generate a revocation cert and
backup everything now. thanks!
Dan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-
Dan Mundy wrote:
> How do i regain a lost private key? if i can't, how can i generate a
> revoke certificate for it? if i can't, can i delete it from the servers?
> what should i do? i need help!
nevermind... i found an old backed-up copy of my private key...
Berend Tober wrote:
> I hate to admit that I still use MS-Excel rather than an open source
> spread sheet tool, but workplace requirements constrain my fate...
> Has anyone else managed a work-around for this flaw? (Aside from the
> obvious -- "Stop using MS-Excel!" -- because that is a failure I c
How do i regain a lost private key? if i can't, how can i generate a
revoke certificate for it? if i can't, can i delete it from the servers?
what should i do? i need help!
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/ma
Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 11:36:32 +0200, Martin Geisler said:
>
>
>>I don't know how Outlook (not Express) handles things.
>
>
> It won't be possible to verify a signature with Outlook due to the
> fact that it is not possible to get to the raw MIME headers. It might
> be possi
Gregor Zattler wrote:
> Did you restart tunderbird or did you exec
> thunderbird --> Menu enigmail --> Submenu OpenPGP key management
> --> New Window: Menu File --> Submenu Reload Key Cache?
i did both, and still, i got the same message.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
Maybe you should disable composition of HTML messages by default, then
this won't happen (Tools > Account Settings > Composition & Addressing).
...or you could use pgp/mime, which i normally use (i am at someone
else's house, so i can't use it for this message...)
D
Erpo wrote:
Someone emailed me rather than the list about a post I made regarding
transparently encrypting filesystems. Due to a bug I just discovered in
my mail client (Evolution 2.0.4) it would be a hassle to reply to that
message. However, that person is on the list, so here is my reply:
It i
Werner Koch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We are pleased to announce the availability of a release candidate for
> the forthcoming 1.4.2 version of gnupg:
> ...
> Please try it out and report any problems to the gnupg-devel or
> gnupg-users list (http://www.gnupg.org/documentation/mailing-lists.html).
compile
Found a problem!! Weird one though...
when setting key trust with enigmail for Thunderbird, the openpgp
management gives me an 'undefined error', but after this, it changes the
trust as if nothing went wrong. I even was the light flashing on my USB
drive, indicating file modification. Weird... S
David Shaw wrote:
> Plus, plus, plus.
No minuses, though, i hope?
Dan
p.s. i have started using pgp/mime as a default.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mail
Erpo wrote:
> He's already doing this. Now he wants his system to automatically
> encrypt every file before it's written to that partition, and decrypt
> every file every time an application tries to read it in either OS.
> DM-Crypt does this for Linux, and NTFS has this capability in windows,
> bu
David Shaw wrote:
> Funny you should mention that Install the 1.4.2 release
> candidate, do --edit-key and then "clean sigs". This is a new feature
> in 1.4.2, and I'm still playing around with ways to tie it into export
> and import (optionally).
>
> Anyway, if you do "clean sigs", it'll s
> i had just the opposite problem. i can't find any kind of a linux
> driver for my USB drive.
I have since figured out how to mount my USB drive in linux, and have
edited linux's gpg.conf to accommodate for that.
Dan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
i was wondering this too, as here is my verbose key:
pub 1024D/8061A830 2005-04-26
uid Dan Mundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig sig 8061A830 2005-04-26 __ __ [selfsig]
sig sig3 8061A830 2005-05-28 __ __ [selfsig]
sig sig3 8061A830 2005
Erpo wrote:
>The spanish thread on the list right now is revolving around the problem
>of sharing encrypted data between WinXP and Linux. The original poster
>wants to share a read/write partition between the two OSs on a laptop
>and have transparent encryption of the files on that partition.
>
>
Martin Geisler wrote:
>Dan Mundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>>here's just 1 more test of what i can posibly do!! please excuse me!
>>
>>
>
>Please stop using a public mailinglist for your tests! You will fill
>the archives with nonse
Kiefer, Sascha wrote:
>Hmm.
>I just implemented RFC2015 3 days ago.
>The format of PGP/MIME described in that paper does not match the format
>you are using.
>Your mails start with a Content-Type of multipart/mixed and you declare
>The pgp data as attachments. But this is not true.
>Maybe I'm miss
--- Begin Message ---
I'm wondering which kind of signing you did on this mail?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Mundy
> Sent: Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 02:31
> To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> Subject: GnuPG
hey all,
i was wondering what the differences between conventional gpg
clearsigning and pgp/mime signing are. which one's better for what?
which should i use more often? please help me!
thanks all,
Dan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
here's just 1 more test of what i can posibly do!! please excuse me!
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sean C. C. wrote:
> Dan, When you click on the reply button it should automatically add
> the "Re: " to the Subject.
>
> Dan Mundy said the following on 6/3/2005 4:39 PM:
>
> I am very confused as to how to reply to a m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Dear Dan
>
> Thanks for those answers. Thanks to help from this group, PGPNET
> and PGP-basics on yahoo groups, I've progressed further
>
> Should I have other questions, I shall post them here
>
> Thanks again
>
> Subu
You're very welcome, Subu.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am very confused as to how to reply to a message and make it display
as an indented response, for example, responses to the topic "Pref" at
the beginning of the month.
how do i do what David Shaw did? is it something with the subject
line, like "Re:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, I'm glad someone out there saw that message... anyway, now
I've got the hang of these mailing lists!
Alright, I understand that nobody really knows I'm Dan Mundy.
But about key signing parties, you guys really are nerds! Oh
wel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well I'm glad someone out there saw that message... Anyway I see your
point about user identity. About those keysigning parties, I see you
guys are nerds! Don't worry, so am I... Anyway, you can /choose/ to
sign my key, but you don't really have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hey everyone, just letting you all know i'm new to mailing lists.
by the way, here's my public key. make sure to sign it!
Public key for 0x4DB6E71B8061A830
- -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
mQGiBEJuhSERBADLM03w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> - Lets say I get a signed message - like the ones from this
> "gnupg-users" list - I click on the "pen" ICON (displayed by
> Mozilla) to check the signature - I get a message "public key not
> found" - I proceed to try and download the public key fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i had just the opposite problem. i can't find any kind of a linux
driver for my USB drive. but i quickly figured out how to set this up
in windows without regedit. here's what you do.
1. open gpg.conf (located in your "application data" folder)
2. a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> / Which keyserver(s) should I use? I heard that some should not
>> be used. Just
> />/ want to know what to put in my conf file. /
The fastest and most reliable keyserver I have come across is this:
website usage - http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de/
gpg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Overdog wrote:
> switch to the build directory. do the following
>
> ./configure make sudo make install (or otherwise do "make install"
> as root).
>
> On 1 Jun 2005, at 16:33, Dan Mundy wrote:
>
> I can'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I can't for the life of me figure out how to install GPG for Red Hat
Linux 9. I have version 1.2.1, which came with my distro, but I would
like to upgrade now. I tried to find and rpm, but they're all for
like Fedora Core, SuSE, etc. Also, when I do
the public keyring used by enigmail is the same one that gpg uses. so
find your WinXP user's "Application Data" folder, go to "gnupg" and
the public keyring will be "pubring.gpg" (unless you have it
configured to be elsewhere, and you would know if
33 matches
Mail list logo
