Re: gpgsm: (pinentry:24664): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: Object class GtkSecureEntry doesn't implement property 'editing-canceled' from interface 'GtkCellEditable'

2012-05-23 Thread Daiki Ueno
tp://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=pinentry.git;a=commit;h=671a1a70 Is there any chance of new release? :-) Regards, -- Daiki Ueno ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: gpg --list-secret-keys does not skip revoked keys

2010-12-23 Thread Daiki Ueno
Daiki Ueno writes: > BTW, I'm wondering if there is any reason why the validity field (Field > 2 of --with-colons output) is not used for secret keys. It might be > useful for the libraries which call gpg internally (epg.el I mean :) to > check if a key is usable. Actually, it

gpg --list-secret-keys does not skip revoked keys

2010-12-22 Thread Daiki Ueno
Hi, I noticed that gpg --list-secret-keys skips expired keys but not revoked keys. For example, when I have two keys (one is expired and another is revoked): $ gpg --list-keys A6CC6651 D1458906 pub 2048R/A6CC6651 2010-11-10 [expired: 2010-11-17] uid Daiki Ueno pub 2048R

Re: EncFS patch

2010-11-10 Thread Daiki Ueno
al log: $ g13 -r A6CC6651 --create foo $ mkdir /tmp/x $ g13 --mount foo /tmp/x & $ echo aaa > /tmp/x/passwords $ pkill g13 $ ls /tmp/x # there are no files $ g13 --mount foo /tmp/x & $ ls /tmp/x passwords Regards, -- Daiki Ueno ___ Gnupg-u

Re: GnuPG 2.1 beta released

2010-11-10 Thread Daiki Ueno
annotate' I couldn't find --annotate option in EncFS versions from 1.4 to 1.7.3. Do I need some patch to EncFS for G13? Regards, -- Daiki Ueno ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: How do I flush a bad symmetric password from gpg-agent?

2009-08-19 Thread Daiki Ueno
hat gpg-agent had stored the bad passphrase > >> and would not let me access the file. I have occasionally in the past > > > > This is a new and probably not too well tested feature. I'll check whey > > this is going wrong. > Fair enough, thanks. That&