On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:58 PM Sarun Intaralawan
wrote:
> I'm not able to answer your main question, but I believe it is you explained.
> However, regarding the matter in P.S., I'm glad to inform you that such a
> tool exists. It is called pass [1] and it is fully integrated with GnuPG and
>
Hello all!
Given the recent survey in password managers security [1], which
concluded with their failure to properly sanitize / scrub the
sensitive data (i.e. "master key") in "running locked state", I was
wondering how does GnuPG Agent fare in this regard?
More specifically:
* let's assume that
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 1:57 PM Peter Lebbing wrote:
> > https://gist.github.com/cipriancraciun/c8a0dfb973b586053c167fec91093d9c
>
> Hey, that systemd service file seems to basically grab cryptsetup
> handling from the clutches of systemd, enabling all sorts of operations
> not possible with sys
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 7:32 PM Peter Lebbing wrote:
> AFAIK, this is just systemd delegating passphrase querying to the
> physically present user. I suppose if you could somehow influence where
> it got the passphrase from, there might be a way to achieve it, but I
> have no idea how. That's all t
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Matt Garman wrote:
> Steps to demonstrate issue:
> (1) Start gpg-agent with --no-detach option
> (2) Make sure $DISPLAY is not set to force pinentry to fallback to curses
> (3) Attempt to decode a gpg-encrypted file to trigger pinentry
>
> [...]
>
> (I realize the g
I encounter a very anoing issue... If a certain "packet" is encrypted
to multiple private keys, and I happen to have two (or multiple) of
them in my secret keychain, then when decrypting, although GPG always
tries them in the same order, the order is not the one I would
prefer...
Thus, is it poss
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Mark Rousell wrote:
> On 04/06/2014 09:32, Werner Koch wrote:
>> Maybe Google now fears that users move away from Gmail and to mitigate
>> that they provide end-to-end so that they still have access to their
>> user's traffic pattern.
>
> Oh perhaps they simply tak
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:16 PM, David Smith wrote:
> OK, so here's a list of issues:
>
> 3. If you're thinking of piping the output of an existing, unsecured
> editor into gpg, then that's not going to work, as the "stdout" will
> contain what it wants to print on the screen and the reactions to
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:54, ciprian.crac...@gmail.com said:
>
>>> Not a good idea, because GnuPG 2.1 requires the gpg-agent and won't see
>>> any private key stuff.
>>
>> Not necessarily if you use the `--batch`, `--no-use-agent`, or
>> `--n
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:15, ciprian.crac...@gmail.com said:
>> * (preferably) implement a fake `gpg` which does the following:
>> opens a pipe as you have done in your example, writes the password and
>
> Not a good idea, because GnuPG 2.1
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Face wrote:
> Hell all,
>
> I am trying to pipe my passphrase to unlock the key. my problem is
> like this, when I use git
> to sign a tag gnupg ask for the passphrase and i need to pipe the passphrase.
>
> I try
> echo "my long passphrase" | git tag -s 1.0.0.42 -
I've used the `dtmx` tool to export some GPG keys (exactly a 4096
bits one) and it worked.
What I did was something like:
paperkey --secret-key ./key.gpg --output ./key.paperkey
--output-type raw
dmtxwrite --encoding 8 --format png --resolution 72
<./key.paperkey >./key.png
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:08 PM, David Shaw wrote:
>>> On Oct 12, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote:
>>>
>>&g
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:08 PM, David Shaw wrote:
>> On Oct 12, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all!
>>>
>>> I'm facing the following problem: I n
Could someone prove me wrong? (I'm not a hardware expert, but I
believe it's technical possible.)
Ciprian.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Mario Castelán Castro
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:47 PM, David Shaw wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2009, at 9:42 AM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote:
>
>> Maybe someone could clear this out (at least from GnuPG part). (My
>> original post was related with both GnuPG an OpenSSH).
>>
>> ~~ Or
(I'll try to start a new thread from the following quotes.)
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Matt wrote:
>> If I had a sufficiently good passphrase, would Google returning my
>> secret key as the first hit result for every search for a day still be
>> secure?
>
> "S
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Brian O'Kennedy wrote:
> Hi All,
> This is a complete n00b question, but I still need to get an opinion on
> this.
> I've created myself a public/private key and got a bit concerned that if my
> harddrive fails, I lost the key and all data I've ever encrypted using
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin
wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I've writ
y A6FD8839 from http server stores.volution.ro
gpg: /tmp/gpg-test/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
gpg: key A6FD8839: public key "Ciprian Dorin Craciun
" imported
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1
gpg: error retrieving `cipr...@vo
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:08 PM, David Shaw wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote:
>
>> Hello all!
>>
>> I'm facing the following problem: I need to run gpg-agent, but
>> without him going into background. Is there any sol
Hello all!
I'm facing the following problem: I need to run gpg-agent, but
without him going into background. Is there any solution to this one?
Thanks,
Ciprian.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/m
22 matches
Mail list logo
