GP.
If there wasn't user research done, can I suggest doing some?
With the utmost respect to the list members, you (we) are not
non-expert users, and so our opinions really don't matter.
The focus of Nicolai's question is *non-expert*, so we need to get
their opinions.
S
rvices, MacGPG into one package, and
works pretty well.
I have used it to create keys to be used on Android devices as would be
expected..
[1] https://gpgtools.org/
Bernard
--
Bernard / bluboxthief / ei8fdb
If you’d like to get in touch, please do: http://me.ei8f
webpage technically had 99% of the information needed,
it was not very user-friendly, particularly to a non-seasoned KSP person. I
really hope they can redesign it to be easier to read.
If you need some help, please let me know as I’d happily help out.
All the best,
Bernard
On 12 Feb 2014, at
straight forward in terms of
interactions and so I’d like to make is slightly more informative to the lay
GPG user.
Saturday seems like a good day.
All the best,
Bernard
--
Bernard / bluboxthief / ei8fdb
If you’d like to get in touch, please do: http
> So I added another subkey, 2048-bit, but the customer says GPG is
> looking for a 2048 subkey *by itself*. Does that make sense?
Not especially. Subkeys don't exist in isolation. They only exist as
part of a larger key.
Your customer's request doesn't appear to be particularly well-phrased.
New to list; first post.
We send member companies our 1024 bit public key with its 1024-bit
subkey to encrypt their A/R files before they're FTP'd to us. A new
customer is requesting we generate a new key for them that has a 2048
sub key, claiming GPG requires this by default. So I added another
---^
Many thanks
Bernard
My apologies: My ISP uses a white list based SPAM filter so it would
be easier to respond to the list because the filter knows gnupg.org
but does not know individual users of the list who would be blocked.
___
Gnupg-use
F145 7D9B AB8F D49C 18C3 9694 1CBB 4C01" not
found: eof
gpg: 361C C290 F145 7D9B AB8F D49C 18C3 9694 1CBB 4C01: delete key
failed: eof
Thanks again
Bernard
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:00:30 -0400, you wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 11:38:22AM +1200, Bernard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
ey
1CBB4C01
It looks like I am doing what the error message requests: Specifying
the key by fingerprint.
Am I overlooking anything?
I am desparately looking for an answer to this (in clean simple batch
mode).
Many thanks
Bernard
___
Gnupg-users mai
