Re: failed decryption

2015-04-19 Thread Adam Gold
On 4/19/2015 11:08, Pete Stephenson wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Mick Crane wrote: >> The problem with encrypting files for storage seems to be that if there is >> any corruption there is no way to get any of it back. > > In such cases it might be worthwhile to use some sort of >

failed decryption

2015-04-18 Thread Adam Gold
I'm attempting to decrypt a symmetrically encrypted tarball appx 25GB in size. It goes as follows: gpg [file].tar.bz2.gpg gpg: AES256 encrypted data gpg: encrypted with 1 passphrase gpg: packet(7) with unknown version 41 gpg: WARNING: encrypted message has been manipulated! gpg: packet(5) with un

RE: message digest for signed emails

2013-09-10 Thread Adam Gold
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor [mailto:d...@fifthhorseman.net] > Sent: 10 September 2013 15:59 > To: Adam Gold > Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org > Subject: Re: message digest for signed emails > > gpg is not a mail user agent. what are you using

message digest for signed emails

2013-09-10 Thread Adam Gold
I apologise in advance if this is a repeat question (I have consulted the archives although not exhaustively) but I've been trying to get this right for two days now to no avail. I want the message digest for my emails to be SHA512 (or SHA256) but I can't seem to change it from SHA1. I have tried