Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote in
<87o750bw4x@jacob.g10code.de>:
|On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 10:00, Daniel Kahn Gillmor said:
|
|> part. That said, i suspect you have a more technical userbase than the
|> pool of people i correspond with.
|
|ROFL
There is btw also Content-Description:. (D
On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 10:00, Daniel Kahn Gillmor said:
> part. That said, i suspect you have a more technical userbase than the
> pool of people i correspond with.
ROFL
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-sign
On Fri 2024-09-06 14:00:53 +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> See
> GpgOL: Add filenames for PGP/MIME parts
> https://dev.gnupg.org/T4258
>
> on how to solve that. Complaints about strange attachments dropped to
> nearly zero after we deployed that change 5 years ago.
This is a great idea, and certainl
On Thu, 5 Sep 2024 11:04, Daniel Kahn Gillmor said:
> PS for the record, i think there is one major concern about PGP/MIME
>multipart/signed: for users of MUAs that don't understand PGP/MIME,
>the signature shows up as a mystery attachment. I can't tell you the
See
GpgOL: Add filenames
Hi!
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:37, Jakob Bohm said:
> status-fd output for a multitude of situation specific strings.
> Sometimes it is even necessary to check if the expected signing key is
> mentioned in specific ways.
Right. That is because there are a lot of use cases for signatures
which requ