Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote in
<20230612-rename-satirical-b8339e@meerkat>:
|On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:54:45PM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|>|No it isn't. Changing the subject and adding the footer is a damaging
|>|anti-pattern from mid-nineties. If the end-user wan
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:54:45PM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> |No it isn't. Changing the subject and adding the footer is a damaging
> |anti-pattern from mid-nineties. If the end-user wants to filter mail, \
> |they can
> |do it based on the List-Id header or any other criteria. Lists tha
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote in
<20230612-landline-jawless-f2c113@meerkat>:
|On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely via Gnupg-us\
|ers wrote:
|>> What the list-software would need to do is to strip the original \
|>> DKIM signature
|>
|> Why?
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> > What the list-software would need to do is to strip the original DKIM
> > signature
>
> Why? Original signatures can often be recovered. They shouldn't be removed
> anyway.
If list-software is doing somethi
On Mon 12/Jun/2023 13:05:51 +0200 Alexander Leidinger via Gnupg-users wrote:
Quoting Alessandro Vesely via Gnupg-users (from Mon, 12
Jun 2023 10:57:32 +0200):
Hi,
would someone please explain DKIM settings of lists.gnupg.org?
I'm not involved in gnupg.org administration, but it looks like
P.P.S.: .. and getting off-topic ..
Leonardo Taccari posted a brilliant idea to the already closed
nawk issue that should not be concealed, to which i just now
responded
--- Forwarded from Steffen Nurpmeso ---
|Hello!
|
|Leonardo Taccari wrote in
| :
||@sdaoden another possible way - that s
Quoting Alessandro Vesely via Gnupg-users
(from Mon, 12 Jun 2023 10:57:32 +0200):
Hi,
would someone please explain DKIM settings of lists.gnupg.org?
I'm not involved in gnupg.org administration, but it looks like there
are none.
Looking at recent posts, I counted 44 with a failed signa
Hi,
would someone please explain DKIM settings of lists.gnupg.org?
Looking at recent posts, I counted 44 with a failed signature by d=gnupg.org,
22 with no DKIM signature at all and none with a good signature.
I'm asking because there was a proposal to eliminate SPF from DMARC
authentication
Am Freitag 09 Juni 2023 14:25:01 schrieb Werner Koch via Gnupg-users:
> A really proper solution would use a function to decode field 7
And potentially filter for otherwise valid pubkeys. >;)
Best,
Bernhard
--
https://intevation.de/~bernhard +49 541 33 508 3-3
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE;
