Re: Why is --auto-key-locate only for encrypting?

2021-09-01 Thread raf via Gnupg-users
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 01:50:36PM +0200, Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Mittwoch, 1. September 2021 07:55:21 CEST raf via Gnupg-users wrote: > > Why is the --auto-key-locate only for encrypting (says > > the gpg(1) manpage)? Wouldn't it also be useful when > > receiving emails and verifying signatures

Re: Why is --auto-key-locate only for encrypting?

2021-09-01 Thread Phil Pennock via Gnupg-users
On 2021-09-01 at 13:50 +0200, Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Mittwoch, 1. September 2021 07:55:21 CEST raf via Gnupg-users wrote: > > Why is the --auto-key-locate only for encrypting (says > > the gpg(1) manpage)? Wouldn't it also be useful when > > receiving emails and verifying signatures? > > --auto-

Re: Why is --auto-key-locate only for encrypting?

2021-09-01 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Mittwoch, 1. September 2021 07:55:21 CEST raf via Gnupg-users wrote: > Why is the --auto-key-locate only for encrypting (says > the gpg(1) manpage)? Wouldn't it also be useful when > receiving emails and verifying signatures? --auto-key-locate looks up keys by email address. It makes no sense w

Why is --auto-key-locate only for encrypting?

2021-09-01 Thread raf via Gnupg-users
Hi, debian-11, gpg-2.2.27 Why is the --auto-key-locate only for encrypting (says the gpg(1) manpage)? Wouldn't it also be useful when receiving emails and verifying signatures? cheers, raf ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lis

Request: --export-options export-dane-modern

2021-09-01 Thread raf via Gnupg-users
Hi, Is there any chance that a new export option could be added (alongside or instead of export-dane) to output "modern" Bind9 zonefile syntax (i.e. "OPENPGPKEY" rather than "TYPE61 \# 2193", and base64 rather than hexadecimal)? I suppose it's not important. It's just prettier. But since DNS que