Re: We shall value email usage

2021-04-01 Thread l0f4r0--- via Gnupg-users
Hi, 1 avr. 2021, 18:19 de gnupg-users@gnupg.org: > Why stop? > You're right. Today is the good day to break habits, think out of the box and do things differently! ;) Best regards, l0f4r0 ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lis

[admin] April Fools Day

2021-04-01 Thread Werner Koch via Gnupg-users
Hi! I ponder with the idea of shutting down the ML for a few days around next year's April 1 to keep discussions a bit more serious. But well, if you want to have some fun, please make it a bit more clear in your proposals. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt

Re: We shall value email usage

2021-04-01 Thread Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users
On 01/04/2021 15:39, Stefan Vasilev via Gnupg-users wrote: Another option would be direct FAX/GnuPG usage, with a different armor, which is OCR friendly. From a purely practical point of view, why would anyone in the modern world use a system where a digital message is rendered in OCR-able fo

Re: We shall value email usage

2021-04-01 Thread Stefan Vasilev via Gnupg-users
Johan Wevers wrote: Sorry for not quoting your message! Let's say it this way, Bernhard likes to promote email usage for GnuPG, or why should we here on this Mailing List value email usage (with a MUA)? I showed a couple of examples to make it for the surveillance industry a bit harder to col

Re: We shall value email usage

2021-04-01 Thread Stefan Vasilev via Gnupg-users
Andrew Gallagher wrote: On 01/04/2021 15:39, Stefan Vasilev via Gnupg-users wrote: Another option would be direct FAX/GnuPG usage, with a different armor, which is OCR friendly. From a purely practical point of view, why would anyone in the modern world use a system where a digital message i

Re: We shall value email usage

2021-04-01 Thread Johan Wevers
On 01-04-2021 17:54, Stefan Vasilev via Gnupg-users wrote: > Fax is faster than email and arrives, while email delivery to a > recipient can not On;y if the recipient has a landline that can always pickup the fax call. A more and more uncommon situation. I don't have a landline anymore, no use fo

Re: We shall value email usage

2021-04-01 Thread Stefan Vasilev via Gnupg-users
Johan Wevers wrote: On 31-03-2021 22:28, Stefan Vasilev via Gnupg-users wrote: Hopefully the Industry will take a look at affordable hardware based encrypted Fax comms for Fax? To get the information on paper? In 2021? Why? Fax is faster than email and arrives, while email delivery to a re

Re: We shall value email usage

2021-04-01 Thread Johan Wevers
On 31-03-2021 22:28, Stefan Vasilev via Gnupg-users wrote: > Hopefully the Industry will take a look at affordable hardware based > encrypted Fax comms for Fax? To get the information on paper? In 2021? Why? > Hardware based AES/DH crypto phones (no smartphones) would be a welcome > addition too

Re: We shall value email usage

2021-04-01 Thread Stefan Vasilev via Gnupg-users
Bernhard Reiter wrote: Am Mittwoch 31 März 2021 22:28:45 schrieb Stefan Vasilev via Gnupg-users: The more I think about GnuPG with email MUA usage I strongly believe that the Industry has better options than email, especially when it comes to decentralised and confidential communications. And

gpgsm on mac (fink or ports)

2021-04-01 Thread Uwe Brauer via Gnupg-users
Hi My main machine is a X1 running Ubuntu 16.04. I have to use a macbook as well for which I currently installed fink. I mostly signing and encrypting with smime and emacs+gpgsm work nicely on my Ubuntu machine. Does anybody know, whether I can install gpgsm on fink or ports? (Or homebrew as m

Re: We shall value email usage

2021-04-01 Thread Bernhard Reiter
Am Mittwoch 31 März 2021 22:28:45 schrieb Stefan Vasilev via Gnupg-users: > The more I think about GnuPG with email MUA usage I strongly believe > that the Industry has better options than email, especially when it comes > to decentralised and confidential communications. And what options would th