On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:08 PM Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Montag, 29. März 2021 15:09:02 CEST J Rt via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am using several smartcards with the same private key for redundancy in
> > case I lose one of them. I have been doing so for several years, and
> > occa
* Bernhard Reiter:
> Just wondering if there is a standard for sharing email drafts ...
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154 defines optional attributes for
"special-use" mailboxes. That applies to IMAP only, of course, but it
may be sufficient, depending on a user's client/server combination.
-R
On Montag, 29. März 2021 15:09:02 CEST J Rt via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using several smartcards with the same private key for redundancy in
> case I lose one of them. I have been doing so for several years, and
> occasionally changing which card I use has always been a bit of a hazz
Am Donnerstag 25 März 2021 12:34:15 schrieb Klaus Ethgen:
> if you start editing a mail with thunderbird and put it to
> drafts. Then finishing the edit with mutt.
Just wondering if there is a standard for sharing email drafts ...
Anyhow implementing the wrapped message method of protected header
Am Donnerstag 25 März 2021 15:56:10 schrieb Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users:
> I don't want to be associated with anything where he's in a
> position of authority.
(Though we did establish that GnuPG is indendent of GNU decisions these days.
And FSFE is an independent organisation. Both share s
Hi all,
I am using several smartcards with the same private key for redundancy in
case I lose one of them. I have been doing so for several years, and
occasionally changing which card I use has always been a bit of a hazzle
(in the lines of for example the discussion here:
https://sven-seeberg.de/
