On Fri 2021-03-19 15:30:51 -0700, Mark via Gnupg-users wrote:
> It also has issues with signed messages and lists. For example you
> signed this message but it says "uncertain digital signature". I don't
> remember this being an issue in the older TB/Enigmail.
Signed messages on mailing lists tha
On Fri 2021-03-19 08:29:12 +0100, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> You may also skip the menu thing and use
>
> gpg --quick-gen-key b...@example.com future-default
I agree with Werner's recommendation of using --quick-gen-key and
future-default.
If you're going to provide an e-mail address-
Vincent Pelletier wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:32:14 -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users
wrote:
The difference is that you *know* an unencrypted key is lying around at
risk of compromise, and you knowingly chose to take that risk when you
chose to store the key unencrypted.
Pard
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:32:14 -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> The difference is that you *know* an unencrypted key is lying around at
> risk of compromise, and you knowingly chose to take that risk when you
> chose to store the key unencrypted.
Pardon my non-gpg-familiarity, but
Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users wrote:
I first heard of the GNU Project and the Free Software Foundation in
1995. For twenty-six years I've supported the FSF and FSFE in a
variety of different ways. For these twenty-six years, Richard
Stallman has been at the forefront of the FSF. In all th
> Interestingly, when I tried searching the latest GnuPG code base (cloned from
> github)
> for the "Weak encryption key" error message, nothing showed up.
>
> $ "grep -iRl "Weak encryption key" gnupg
>
>
It appears that the problem lies in libgcrypt, which refuses to set a key for
this
cipher
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:34, Bernhard Reiter said:
> restructured.) So yes, RMS had some influence over GnuPG. I don't think I've
He has not more influence on GnuPG than on GNOME, which he claims to be
the GNU desktop. GnuPG still shows the FSF copyright on Unix e as an
appreciation for all the t
Please run
make V=1
there should be really some more output than just "syntax error". I
need to see that to figure out where xlc bails out. I am also not aware
of other reports from AIX users/
Here is a bit more (helpful) information
loaded from gnupg.org:
-rw-r-1 root system
On Dienstag, 23. März 2021 14:31:00 CET jsmith9810--- via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Interestingly, when I tried searching the latest GnuPG code base (cloned
> from github) for the "Weak encryption key" error message, nothing showed
> up.
>
> $ "grep -iRl "Weak encryption key" gnupg
>
It's defined in
Am Dienstag 23 März 2021 10:23:32 schrieb Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users:
> Regardless of whether he officially has power, he clearly unofficially
> has power. He's contacted me a few times over the years to insist on
> changes to the FAQ, usually over incredibly silly details like saying
> our
> > I try to import this key manually (--import), gpg throws a "weak
> > encryption key" error and refuses to import it. ...which I find
>
> Can you please paste the exact error message and the output of
> "gpgconf --show-versions"?
>
>
> Shalom-Salam,
>
>Werner
>
Sure. My gpgconf doesn't seem
On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 19:06, Frank said:
> I am trying to compile gnupg-2.2.27 and it fails with "syntax error"
> on g10/t-keydb.c.
> I was yet unable to gather more informations, what is going wrong.
> No line, statement or anything else is given.
Please run
make V=1
there should be really som
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:43, jsmith9810--- said:
> I try to import this key manually (--import), gpg throws a "weak
> encryption key" error and refuses to import it. ...which I find
Can you please paste the exact error message and the output of
"gpgconf --show-versions"?
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
Dear GnuPG community,
email is a decentral standard for asynchronus communication
* one-to-one messenging
* closed groups
* public discussions (via mailinglists)
* trust anchor (as needed by many accounts on web-sites)
There is a wealth of Free Software implementations
and service providers,
The FSFE is an independent sister organisation with a separate
leadership, and the framework agreement FSFE has with FSF does not give a
single person a special influcence or one of the organisations a special
power over the other.
Regardless of whether he officially has power, he clearly unoffi
Hi Frank,
Am Samstag 20 März 2021 19:06:41 schrieb Frank:
> I am trying to compile gnupg-2.2.27 and it fails with "syntax error"
> on g10/t-keydb.c.
> I was yet unable to gather more informations, what is going wrong.
> No line, statement or anything else is given.
can you give the precise comman
Am Montag 22 März 2021 23:32:14 schrieb Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users:
> I am assuming that there is some more severe problem with OpenPGP
> Blowfish key wrapping, since the situation you describe would not
> warrant the measures GPG has taken.
Not know details about this one: Sometimes stuff g
Dear Robert,
Am Dienstag 23 März 2021 06:59:44 schrieb Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users:
> None of us have to tolerate toxic leadership. We can always leave. For
> that reason, I'm stepping down as the FAQ maintainer.
thanks for your contributions to GnuPG and its FAQ!
(And I hope there will b
18 matches
Mail list logo
