On Freitag, 23. Oktober 2020 21:48:49 CEST Hammett, Rich via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> Is there a guide anywhere for what versions of GnuPG are supported by what
> versions of GPGME?
Check the documentation of gpgme. The README of the current version reads
"For support of the OpenPGP and the CMS proto
If it is a technical challenge and Kristian as head (pool maintainer),
why does he not ask publicity
the hockeypuck author, dkg and the sequoia-team, for help?
As an example, if I would be Kristian I would do so, set-up with my
pool gang a hockeypuck
test-net (bootstrapped with a handful of pub ke
> On 24 Oct 2020, at 10:41, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users
> wrote:
>
> there can
> be no consensus achieved between privacy loving EU citizens and (US
> based) SKS operators
Most SKS operators are (were?) based outside the US. This is primarily a
technical challenge, not a political one.
A
I can only speak for myself and see that when it comes to SKS that there can
be no consensus achieved between privacy loving EU citizens and (US
based) SKS operators, while Mailvelope and Hagrid respect the users wishes.
With that being said I am out and better let Mr Barr and Mr de Kerchove decid
Ok, thank you.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020, 9:30 AM Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:59, Mike said:
> > I had to recover gnupg file from a corrupted os. The contents of the
> gnupg
> > file are encrypted and are not in openpgp data. So when I try to import
> my
> > keys from 'private-keys-v1
Is there a guide anywhere for what versions of GnuPG are supported by what
versions of GPGME?
I only need encryption and decryption as part of an automated software
framework, and I’m trying to migrate from an existing toolset that uses GnuPG
v1.4 and python-gnupg. We need to be able to pgp en
