Re: Show that an encrypted message was signed, without decrypting it

Helmut Waitzmann Anti-Spam-Ticket.b.qc3c wrote: > Stefan Claas : > >Helmut Waitzmann Anti-Spam-Ticket.b.qc3c wrote: > >> Stefan Claas : > > [The ability to check that an encrypted message has been signed.]  > > > >It would allow Alice (in her organization), or others, to do a > >pre-check, w

Re: Show that an encrypted message was signed, without decrypting it

Stefan Claas : Helmut Waitzmann Anti-Spam-Ticket.b.qc3c wrote: Stefan Claas : [The ability to check that an encrypted message has been signed.]  It would allow Alice (in her organization), or others, to do a pre-check, with procmail etc., to set-up an auto-responder, informing Bob that h

Re: Five volunteers needed (EU .... Are you sure that this is really advantageous?

Ryan McGinnis via Gnupg-users wrote: > CIA Agent 1: Swap out that NFC tag with the malicious one. > CIA Agent 2: But he put a little sticker on it! > CIA Agent 1: My God, all hope is lost Slightly OT, Germany's BSI just send out a couple of days ago *postal* mail to companies and organisations a

Re: In case you use OpenPGP on a smartphone ...

Stefan Claas wrote: > While I personally stopped using online encryption, long ago, after my > Linux system was hacked, [...] https://thehackernews.com/2020/10/finfisher-spyware-raid.html Regards Stefan -- NaClbox: cc5c5f846c661343745772156a7751a5eb34d3e83d84b7d6884e507e105fd675 The computer

Re: Show that an encrypted message was signed, without decrypting it

On 2020-10-13 17:02, Daniel Kahn Gillmor via Gnupg-users wrote: > On Sun 2020-10-11 09:59:12 +0200, Stefan Claas wrote: >> Helmut Waitzmann Anti-Spam-Ticket.b.qc3c wrote: >>> Yes, but why should she want to be able to do that?  She could >>> decrypt the message and, if it turns out that the message

Re: Five volunteers needed (EU .... Are you sure that this is really advantageous?

CIA Agent 1: Swap out that NFC tag with the malicious one. CIA Agent 2: But he put a little sticker on it! CIA Agent 1: My God, all hope is lost On 10/14/20 2:09 AM, Stefan Claas wrote: > Ángel wrote: > >> On 2020-10-11 at 17:41 +0200, Stefan Claas wrote: >>> I had not set a password, so that the

Re: Five volunteers needed (EU .... Are you sure that this is really advantageous?

MFPA wrote: > Hi > > > On Wednesday 14 October 2020 at 8:09:56 AM, in > , Stefan Claas wrote:- > > > > Alice can purchase tamper proof NFC stickers which > > when stripped off get > > destroyed. :-) > > And Eve's replacement sticker added over the top of the destroyed sticker. But this woul

Re: Five volunteers needed (EU .... Are you sure that this is really advantageous?

Hi On Wednesday 14 October 2020 at 8:09:56 AM, in , Stefan Claas wrote:- > Alice can purchase tamper proof NFC stickers which > when stripped off get > destroyed. :-) And Eve's replacement sticker added over the top of the destroyed sticker. -- Best regards MFPA

Re: Why is Blowfish's key size limited to 128 bits in RFC 4880?

My current understanding of the situation is that there are no known effective attacks against Blowfish so long as it's adequately implemented according to the suggested specifications and it's relatively limited block size accounted for, and I naturally tend to gravitate towards tested-and-tr

Re: Five volunteers needed (EU .... Are you sure that this is really advantageous?

Ángel wrote: > On 2020-10-11 at 17:41 +0200, Stefan Claas wrote: > > > > I had not set a password, so that the recipients can play with it. > > With a password set the NFC tag can not be written to. > > > > Bob may be expecting to receive the safe, read-only NFC tag from Alice, > but Eve might