On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 19:37, Werner Koch said:
> I looked at the history and the reason for the described behaviour is
> documented at https://dev.gnupg.org/T2312. I re-opened that bug.
Fixed in master and 2.2 see the ticket above for the patch.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind fre
Hi,
I looked at the history and the reason for the described behaviour is
documented at https://dev.gnupg.org/T2312. I re-opened that bug.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:22, Martin Pätzold said:
> And if the setting is not what I need, how can I prevent the
> permissions for "private-keys-v1.d" from changing?
The --preserve-permissions is a gpg option and not one of gpg-agent. In
fact gpg does not known anything about private-keys-v1.d. A
Hello,
I am working with Debian Stretch (9.13) and GPG 2.1.18.
The "private-keys-v1.d" directory has per default the permissions 700
(drwx--), but I need them to be 770 (drwxrwx---). I can change the
permissions ($ chmod 770 private-keys-v1.d) but after some time they are
be back to 700.
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:14:13 +, Ryan McGinnis via Gnupg-users
stated:
>A. Yes, you can still anonymously register for almost anything. It's
>not straightforward and requires a bit of forethought and jumping
>through hoops. No, it probably won't defeat the NSA, but if they're
>your adversary
> Unless you live in North Korea or something there are always ways around
> SIM registration laws, though they get expensive depending on where you
> live.
>
This may have been true at some point in the past, but unfortunately I
failed to secure this type of solution when I had the chance to. Toda
