That is very true. I have a friend whose first name is M'Lou and she's
had all kinds of issues when systems freak out over her first name.
On 5/21/2020 6:48 AM, Mark H. Wood via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 03:27:28PM -0700, Mark wrote:
>> Did a bit more experimenting with it. Yo
Thanks I may take a look at it and just see what it does. I'm still VERY
much a novice in regards to all this so just trying to learn more. My
"experiment" with Kleopatra was just to see if I could since it said
"optional" for the name part.
Sorry, not sure who dkg is but have seen those initials
Given the number of people that still manage to create (and distribute)
their keys with glaring mistakes, such as misspelling their own domain
name/tld, or providing a key which doesn't match their email address.
Too many people is sending and receiving openpgp emails by actually
encrypting the co
On 2020-05-20 at 18:22 +, Kent A. Larsen wrote:
> I've adding logging to our gpg-agent.conf file, and when these errors
> occur the gpg-agent log file has the following error:
> 2020-05-18 09:36:07 gpg-agent[3800] error binding socket to '\\Neofs1
> \Userapps\Apps\GnuPG\Keys\S.gpg-agent': Unkno
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > First, let me mention that Web of Trust is to me not a useful
> > public key verification mechanism, as it is compromises my privacy.
>
> Only if your sigs are exportable. Local sigs are a perfectly
> legitimate way to use the WoT. If Alice locally signs Bob's
> cer
> First, let me mention that Web of Trust is to me not a useful public
> key verification mechanism, as it is compromises my privacy.
Only if your sigs are exportable. Local sigs are a perfectly legitimate
way to use the WoT. If Alice locally signs Bob's certificate and sets
Bob up as a trusted
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 03:27:28PM -0700, Mark wrote:
> Did a bit more experimenting with it. You can have something only in
> the first name field but it has to be a minimum of 5 characters and the
> first one must be a letter. ..
*sigh*
https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programme
On 21/05/2020 14:34, LisToFacTor via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> The proper thing for gpg program to do would be to allow the
> personally identifiable information in the key to be optional,
> and to warn the user generating such key that he will not be able
> to participate in the Web of Trust.
I think
Mark wrote:
Hi,
> Did a bit more experimenting with it. You can have something only in
> the first name field but it has to be a minimum of 5 characters and
> the first one must be a letter. ..
If you are familiar with GnuPG in command line mode you may try out
sequoia pgp, which I compiled a Wi
On 5/21/20 10:52 AM, Ingo Klöcker - kloec...@kde.org wrote:
On Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2020 00:14:40 CEST LisToFacTor via Gnupg-users wrote:
I suppose you also entered an empty string for "Email address":
`` > Real name:
Email address: f...@example.com
You selected this USER-ID:
"f...@example.co
On Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2020 00:14:40 CEST LisToFacTor via Gnupg-users wrote:
> English is not my native tongue, and the word I've chosen is based
> on my interpretation of the dialog presented by the program when
> generating the key:
>
> > GnuPG needs to construct a user ID to identify your key.
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
