Did a bit more experimenting with it. You can have something only in
the first name field but it has to be a minimum of 5 characters and the
first one must be a letter. ..
On 5/20/2020 3:16 PM, Mark wrote:
> It must be... With all the talk of "anonymous" keys I wanted to see if I
> could create
It must be... With all the talk of "anonymous" keys I wanted to see if I
could create one with Kleopatra, especially since it says optional for
name.
On 5/20/2020 12:27 AM, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
>> On 20 May 2020, at 06:32, Mark wrote:
>>
>> Just to test this out I tried creating a new key in K
On 5/20/20 6:52 PM, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
On 20 May 2020, at 18:51, LisToFacTor via Gnupg-users
wrote:
Demanding a piece of information from someone who would prefer not
to give it is equally user-hostile, especially so if he who demands
it does so only because it is required by some inter
Interestingly enough, this breaks the Thunderbird/Protonmail integration, so
your message just shows up as the raw PGP blob that Protonmail is pushing to
the Protonmail client. It returns the error
" Decryption error
Decryption of this message's encrypted content failed.
openpgp: unsupported
Werner,
If that's the case, then why do we continue to intermittently get the following
messages when issuing a command to sign+encrypt (or decrypt) a file?
gpg: can't connect to the agent: IPC connect call failed
gpg: keydb_search failed: No agent running
gpg: skipped "0x8A811544": No agent run
> On 20 May 2020, at 18:51, LisToFacTor via Gnupg-users
> wrote:
>
> Demanding a piece of information from someone who would prefer not
> to give it is equally user-hostile, especially so if he who demands
> it does so only because it is required by some internal mechanics
> of the system he co
Stefan Claas wrote:
> I ask, because don't you think that this could not have an impact on
> the spread and usage of GnuPG in the EU for business purposes etc.
With that I mean the acceptance of GnuPG Signatures, compared to costly
eIDAS solutions.
Best regards
Stefan
> ___
On 5/20/20 7:27 AM, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
Such a limitation would be user-hostile, as there are people in some cultures
who have only one name, the Indonesian dictator Suharto being one famous
example.
Demanding a piece of information from someone who would prefer not
to give it is equally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 16 May 2020 at 9:49:55 PM, in
, Stefan Claas wrote:-
> out of curiosity, you signed the reply with two sub
> keys,
The RSA signature is for the benefit of recipients who can't handle
ECC keys/signatures. Probably not needed anymor
Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Tue, 19 May 2020 10:29, Robert J. Hansen said:
>
> > * PII-free UIDs are possible today
>
> Well, according to European law this is not that easy because a public
> key is in most cases an attribute which identifies a natural person.
Curious as I am, did
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 18 May 2020 at 7:33:47 AM, in
, Werner Koch via
Gnupg-users wrote:-
> You are using --include-key-block; this is intended
> to be used by MUAs
> to send the encryption key along with a signature to
> allow for immediate
> encrypted r
On Tue, 19 May 2020 10:29, Robert J. Hansen said:
> * PII-free UIDs are possible today
Well, according to European law this is not that easy because a public
key is in most cases an attribute which identifies a natural person.
This is the same as with phone numbers and mail addresses. In Germany
On 18/05/2020 07:14, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Go readup on the failures and impracticalities of CRLs and OCSP.
While I agree that revocation is a Very Hard Problem, I'm not convinced
that its abandonment is warranted. Letsencrypt have sidestepped the
issue by issuing short-expiration c
> On 20 May 2020, at 06:32, Mark wrote:
>
> Just to test this out I tried creating a new key in Kleopatra with no
> name and then with just a single name and it would not let me do it. It
> had to have a first and at least a last initial.
This must be a Kleopatra limitation. I have successfull
14 matches
Mail list logo
