On Sat, 16 May 2020 23:24, John Scott said:
> Looking up recipients with both dirmngr-client and
> gpgsm --verbose --list-external-keys [recipient]
> are fruitless whether I drop the ads\ from my username or not. I've bumped
> the
> ldaptimeout to 25. Still both commands finish instantaneous
On Sun, 17 May 2020 04:33, Ángel said:
> In both cases, most of the signature space is taken by a hashed
> subpacket of type 38. This value is not assigned, but looking at
You are using --include-key-block; this is intended to be used by MUAs
to send the encryption key along with a signature to a
On Sun, 17 May 2020 10:48, Vincent Breitmoser said:
> 1. Without consent, we don't distribute email addresses.
And by that changing the distributed system of keyservers into a
centralized key database like PGP tried this with their Universal
Server. Which unavoidable will change OpenPGP to a cen
> I'm just curious as to what this "GNU" way is? I assume you would
> just a non identifiable email address and then either leave your
> name blank, incomplete, or just plain incorrect.
GNU is a project by the Free Software Foundation. They're very focused
on what they call "free software", wher
Thanks to all the people that chimed in on my question. I was trying to
get an idea how they compared. It was (for me) even more confusing with
the 25519 choices as I didn't know the size of those keys until someone
explained them better.
On 5/11/2020 6:46 PM, Pete Stephenson via Gnupg-users wrote
Thanks I will update it and make sure both Kleopatra and Enigmail are
using the same one so they are "on the same page"
On 5/15/2020 11:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 16:52 -0700, Mark wrote:
>> I know this may be a subjective question but what is the best keyserver
>> to use?
I'm just curious as to what this "GNU" way is? I assume you would just a
non identifiable email address and then either leave your name blank,
incomplete, or just plain incorrect.
Is there another way I am missing?
Thanks
On 5/16/2020 8:56 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> So, when you like to comm
Ángel wrote:
> On 2020-05-16 at 22:49 +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
> > out of curiosity, you signed the reply with two sub keys, but
> > what makes the signature so large, the hash algo used? I must
> > admit I have never seen such a large signature before.
>
> It is quite large, indeed. This Radi
Hey folks,
this thread touches on userid-less keys, and keyservers.
I agree with Peter and Rob's points that userid-less keys are questionable for
use as-is. OpenPGP transfers information in the self-signatures of user ids. If
we use keys without any known UID, we might miss out on e.g. expirat
> Werner sits as secretary of the (largely dormant) group that guides
> OpenPGP development, but there are a lot of non-GnuPG people who are
> deeply involved in giving feedback on proposed changes. He's the
> secretary, not the dictator.
Not everyone agrees.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/
10 matches
Mail list logo
