Hi,
I'm stumped getting gpgsm to lookup S/MIME certificates in my organization.
I've got a temporary working solution with ldapsearch after logging into my
VPN with NetworkManager+OpenConnect:
ldapsearch -Wt -b OU=Accounts,DC=ads,DC=foo,DC=com -D
CN=jscott,OU=Accounts,DC=ads,DC=foo,DC=com '
On 2020-05-16 at 22:49 +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
> out of curiosity, you signed the reply with two sub keys, but
> what makes the signature so large, the hash algo used? I must
> admit I have never seen such a large signature before.
It is quite large, indeed. This Radix 64 block of 12375 bytes c
> I’d like to point out that the options you are referring to are actually
> enabled by default nowadays (since 2.2.17).
Thank you, Damien. :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
htt
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 04:28:58PM -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
With judicious use of the various -clean options, the key spamming bug
is effectively dead...
I’d like to point out that the options you are referring to are actually
enabled by default nowadays (since 2.2.17). So from an user’s
Stefan Claas wrote:
> MFPA wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> >
> > iQ8RBAEWCg65FiEElgyGKNWS/4zei7C/4OLe4dbI7voFAl692adfFIAALgAo
> [...]
>
> > RjfdBwsdZJrUrgtu7YTLAf0/v9mZZBAXfvO8CgNySZfWWZ5IP0BvHLgkUXI0r7Qt
> > kuQMuu7LJiMJFrPQKIL1cQ==
> > =XcGg
> > -END PGP SIGN
MFPA wrote:
[...]
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> iQ8RBAEWCg65FiEElgyGKNWS/4zei7C/4OLe4dbI7voFAl692adfFIAALgAo
[...]
> RjfdBwsdZJrUrgtu7YTLAf0/v9mZZBAXfvO8CgNySZfWWZ5IP0BvHLgkUXI0r7Qt
> kuQMuu7LJiMJFrPQKIL1cQ==
> =XcGg
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Hi,
out of curiosity, you signed th
> Have the bureaucrats who define standards have finally fixed the DOS
> issues about keys spammed with signatures or is it still being
> "discussed whether they are even needed."?
GnuPG had a bug in the key importation code which made it run in time
proportional to the square of the number of sig
On 16-05-2020 17:56, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> I tell them, "I will not be able to use OpenPGP with you until such time
> as you UID conforms to the standard.
You confuse "not being able to" with "not willing to".
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers
PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.
On 16-05-2020 15:57, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> But it is
> also fine for other people to say "okay, sure, you have your
> experimental features, but I'll wait until they're standardized until
> I do the work on implementing them myself; also, let's discuss whether
> they are even needed."
Have the
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > How does this work in general, let's say I am a dev and would add
> > this too, to my OpenPGP app. Is there an OpenPGP board where devs
> > can vote for or against a feature, so that Werner has then to
> > follow suite, or is he in the position to say no and every dev h
> GnuPG users can interact perfectly well with people who use OpenPGP
> software :) As Robert J. Hansen said, if you (or somebody else) want to
> extend the standard, there is an IETF working group and mailing list for
> that.
Please, just "Rob". :)
I share a name with Robert "rsnake" Hansen of
> So, when you like to communicate with a person who uses such a new
> key how do you proceed then?
I tell them, "I will not be able to use OpenPGP with you until such time
as you UID conforms to the standard. Would you like help in making your
user ID standards-conformant in a way that reveals n
Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 04:55:11PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 01:36:10AM +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
> > > Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:54:32PM +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
> > >
> > > > > You know what, the m
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 04:55:11PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 01:36:10AM +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
> > Peter Pentchev wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:54:32PM +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
> >
> > > > You know what, the most interesting thing of this ML for m
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 01:36:10AM +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
> Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:54:32PM +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
>
> > > You know what, the most interesting thing of this ML for me is that
> > > when people, do a request or suggestion the old guard is alw
r...@sixdemonbag.org wrote:
> (Sent from my phone)
>
> If and when people insisting on UID-less keys want to communicate
> with me, I'll tell them the same thing I told users of Imad Faiad's
> PGP 6.5.8ckt builds, Disastry's PGP builds, and many more:
>
> "I'm sorry, but you're not confirming t
(Sent from my phone)If and when people insisting on UID-less keys want to communicate with me, I'll tell them the same thing I told users of Imad Faiad's PGP 6.5.8ckt builds, Disastry's PGP builds, and many more:"I'm sorry, but you're not confirming to the specification. If you wish for me to make
17 matches
Mail list logo
