On 28/08/2019 12:07, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> Whether a compromise is game over depends on your scenario.
Sorry, I meant, it depends on your definition of "game over", definitely
*not* on the scenario.
I think it is perfectly acceptable to say "compromise = game over", the
only way I see that could
On 26/08/2019 01:26, Farhan Khan via Gnupg-users wrote:
> I use gnupg to sign my git commits, but after a few hours of use I
> have to restart gpg-agent. Before doing so, what I presume is
> gpg-agent asks me to re-enter my password on a random terminal (but it
> seems to drop characters and never
On 28/08/2019 00:41, Chris Narkiewicz via Gnupg-users wrote:
> This is not true. Many crypto systems are designed to perform damage
> control and recovery in such cases.
Damage control in the case of GnuPG would be using a smartcard: while
you are using the smartcard, so can the attacker, but once
On 2019-08-28 00:44, Chris Narkiewicz via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On 27/08/2019 20:50, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> But what would be, when using computers at work or public places, then
>> the best strategy for using OpenPGP, without carrying a Notebook or
>> smartphone?
> The strategy I ad
