Can you please move this discussion elsewhere. The purpose of this list
is:
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
About Gnupg-users
GnuPG user help mailing list.
The topic of this is list is help and discussion among users of GnuPG.
This includes questions on how to script GnuPG
In my personal opinion, Facebook has earned their reputation. Their stance
towards privacy has always publicly been "Uhh, what? Privacy? Uh, yeah...
we love privacy!" while they fill their platform with dark patterns and extract
every last bit of usable data you give them into something t
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, 31 July 2019 г., 17:36, Ryan McGinnis via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> Kicking the can down to the endpoints -- but really, haven't you always had
> to trust your app / OS? Unless you coded or audited it yourself from top to
> bottom and built your own ha
On 31.07.2019 14:26, David wrote:
> Consider the fact that for 30 times Enigmail refused to accept the
> passphrase for da...@gbenet.com
>
> I decided to send an encrypted email to Erich. When selecting his
> private key there was no automatic tick in postmaster. But a tick in
> Erich's public key
On 31/07/2019 15:36, Ryan McGinnis via Gnupg-users wrote:
> haven't you always had to trust your app / OS? Unless you coded or
> audited it yourself from top to bottom and built your own hardware
> (hah), there is always a level of trust required in the code/device
Facebook are being expected to a
Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 31/07/2019 14:58, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > an exportable 'blob' for the lsign
> > command, which can be then exchanged and would not be compatible with
> > key servers, in case someone would try to upload such a blob
>
> The keyservers (SKS at least) bl
Kicking the can down to the endpoints -- but really, haven't you always had to
trust your app / OS? Unless you coded or audited it yourself from top to bottom
and built your own hardware (hah), there is always a level of trust required in
the code/device. Trusting Facebook seems... unwise. But
On 31/07/2019 14:58, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> an exportable 'blob' for the lsign
> command, which can be then exchanged and would not be compatible with
> key servers, in case someone would try to upload such a blob
The keyservers (SKS at least) blacklist lsign packets already, so you
Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 11:57, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
>
> > additional paramemter like --add-me for --lsign would make sense, for
>
>--quick-sign-key fpr [names]
>--quick-lsign-key fpr [names]
>
> Directly sign a key from the passphrase
* da...@gbenet.com:
> People say "Oh your settings are wrong" But the FAIL to give the RIGHT
> SETTINGS!! And then go waffling on
People don't fail you. Your entitlement issues do. Falsely stating
software X cannot do Y when you are not using it right, expecting
answers on a s
On 31/07/2019 13:36, David wrote:
> Enigmail always defaults to the first set of keys one created
Enigmail will default to the first set of keys in your keyring that
matches the selection criteria. Do you have more than one ID on each
key? Do you have more than one key for each ID? This could be c
Patrick Brunschwig:
> On 31.07.2019 13:46, David wrote:
>> Hello Erich,
>>
>> I did what you said - associated each email address with it's own key.
>> I then shut down Thunderbird re-started and carried out the following test:
>>
>> Test One:
>>
>> I sent an encrypted and signed email to site-adm
Patrick Brunschwig:
> On 31.07.2019 08:56, David wrote:
>> Patrick Brunschwig:
>>> On 31.07.2019 00:36, David wrote:
Andrew Gallagher:
>
>> On 30 Jul 2019, at 18:47, David wrote:
>>
>> Hello Stefan,
>>
>> I have three email accounts with their own keys - Enigmail does
On 31.07.2019 13:46, David wrote:
> Hello Erich,
>
> I did what you said - associated each email address with it's own key.
> I then shut down Thunderbird re-started and carried out the following test:
>
> Test One:
>
> I sent an encrypted and signed email to site-admin from postmaster. I
> rec
David:
> Erich Eckner via Gnupg-users:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> here is, how I had thunderbird + enigmail running for several years with
>> two keys and without problems (I have switched away from thunderbird
>> since one year ago, because it got too heavy and slow for my taste):
>>
>> For each sending a
On 31.07.2019 08:56, David wrote:
> Patrick Brunschwig:
>> On 31.07.2019 00:36, David wrote:
>>> Andrew Gallagher:
> On 30 Jul 2019, at 18:47, David wrote:
>
> Hello Stefan,
>
> I have three email accounts with their own keys - Enigmail does not
> support this - you ha
On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 11:57, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
> additional paramemter like --add-me for --lsign would make sense, for
--quick-sign-key fpr [names]
--quick-lsign-key fpr [names]
Directly sign a key from the passphrase without any
further u
Erich Eckner via Gnupg-users:
> Hi David,
>
> here is, how I had thunderbird + enigmail running for several years with
> two keys and without problems (I have switched away from thunderbird
> since one year ago, because it got too heavy and slow for my taste):
>
> For each sending address, I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi David,
here is, how I had thunderbird + enigmail running for several years with
two keys and without problems (I have switched away from thunderbird since
one year ago, because it got too heavy and slow for my taste):
For each sending addres
Robert J. Hansen:
>> That's why I am considering other solutions. I have been with
>> Thunderbird and Enigmail for over 20 years with one key pair -
>
> This is simply not possible, as Enigmail didn't exist until 2001. (It
> took until about 2003 before it became really usable.)
>
>
> _
20 matches
Mail list logo
