Am Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2019, 19:34:41 CEST schrieb Werner Koch:
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 23:33, johan...@zarl-zierl.at said:
> > Now that I have done it once, I think the setup without
> > /usr/lib/gnupg/gpg-
>
> > wks-client isn't that complicated either:
> Please use gpg-wks-tool instead; it is much
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 23:33, johan...@zarl-zierl.at said:
> Now that I have done it once, I think the setup without /usr/lib/gnupg/gpg-
> wks-client isn't that complicated either:
Please use gpg-wks-tool instead; it is much easier and less error prone.
> b. Manually, using gpg: gpg --homedir "$(mk
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:59, andr...@andrewg.com said:
> In this instance, I wonder if the apostrophe hasn't screwed something up
> - are apostrophes valid in the MIME boundary charset?
I use that for ages and believe this is all valid. But new Emacs
versions sometimes chnage the spooky list and t
On 10.07.2019 13:35, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Am Mittwoch 10 Juli 2019 10:53:17 schrieb Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users:
If you convince Mutt community that WKD is a good idea I can prepare the
patch for you.
As I'm not on the mutt development channels,
I'd prefer if someone else would do th
Hi,
On Dienstag, 9. Juli 2019 15:02:26 CEST Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> please make suggestions (or help with improving)
> https://wiki.gnupg.org/WKD
I think the problem with that page is that it is handed out as a starting
point to users asking "how can I enable WKD for my key?". To give credit, t
Am Mittwoch 10 Juli 2019 10:53:17 schrieb Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users:
> If you convince Mutt community that WKD is a good idea I can prepare the
> patch for you.
As I'm not on the mutt development channels,
I'd prefer if someone else would do this.
Bernhard
ps.: Still I'm an very occasi
Am Mittwoch 10 Juli 2019 10:33:01 schrieb Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users:
> On 10.07.2019 10:22, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> >> You can also add Debian there and occrp.org (although the latter doesn't
> >> have policy file :().
> >
> > do you have something that can be publically referred to, or
On 10/07/2019 11:27, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
Well now, this email was interesting.
I can view it normally on my iphone, but
Patrick Brunschwig [2019-07-10T10:23:50+02] wrote:
> First users ask for support on getting rid of the keys flooded with
> signatures.
There is no need to get rid of the itself key, just the key signatures
which are the "flood". The commands are --edit-key and then "clean" or
"minimize". It is a
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:53, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
> If you convince Mutt community that WKD is a good idea I can prepare
> the patch for you. As far as I remember it's very minimal and I'd be
Actually I started to work on Mutt (not NeoMutt, though) but had to give
up due to time constraints.
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:23, patr...@enigmail.net said:
> Is it sufficient to run "gpg --delete-keys 0x...", and wait for quite a
> while, or does it require other measures?
--edit-key and then use "clean" to remove them. And well, install
2.2.17 to avoid future trouble.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
Hi Bernhard,
On 10.07.2019 10:38, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Am Dienstag 09 Juli 2019 20:51:41 schrieb Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users:
Sure, take a look at the thread starting here:
http://lists.mutt.org/pipermail/mutt-dev/Week-of-Mon-20180702/000157.html
(The patch is not there but it's basi
Hi Wiktor,
= integrate WKD requests into mutt
Am Dienstag 09 Juli 2019 20:51:41 schrieb Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users:
> Sure, take a look at the thread starting here:
> http://lists.mutt.org/pipermail/mutt-dev/Week-of-Mon-20180702/000157.html
>
> (The patch is not there but it's basically
On 10.07.2019 10:22, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
You can also add Debian there and occrp.org (although the latter doesn't
have policy file :().
do you have something that can be publically referred to, or a contact person
I could ask that they are fine being listed in the wiki?
If you see the staf
First users ask for support on getting rid of the keys flooded with
signatures.
Is it sufficient to run "gpg --delete-keys 0x...", and wait for quite a
while, or does it require other measures?
Thanks,
Patrick
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Hi Wiktor,
Am Dienstag 09 Juli 2019 20:51:41 schrieb Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users:
> > please help us to keep the list of
> > supporting organisations growing at https://wiki.gnupg.org/WKD
> You can also add Debian there and occrp.org (although the latter doesn't
> have policy file :().
d
On 2019-07-09 at 15:55 -0500, Daniel Roesler via Gnupg-users wrote:
> While adding the ability for 0x50 signatures would be nice, I would
> still like to explore ways of users self-limiting signatures within
> the existing gpg command line, since most users will be just using
> whatever version is
17 matches
Mail list logo
