> https://gist.github.com/rjhansen/67ab921ffb4084c865b3618d6955275f
I stand by what I wrote.
As usual, don't read the comments unless you want to despair for humanity.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/li
Interesting discussion thread on this over at HN:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20312826
-Ryan McGinnis
http://bigstormpicture.com
PGP: 486ED7AD
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 12:51, Ryan McGinnis wrote:
> https://gist.github.com/rjhansen/67ab921ffb4084c865b36
> On 21 Jun 2019, at 21:49, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> So if we decide we only want to address use case (c), then it doesn't
> seem too crazy to imagine reconciliation among multiple installations of
> all the distributed, cryptographically-validated *non-identity* data
> that hagrid is desi
Ryan McGinnis via Gnupg-users wrote:
> https://gist.github.com/rjhansen/67ab921ffb4084c865b3618d6955275f
>
> -Ryan McGinnis
> http://bigstormpicture.com
> PGP: 486ED7AD
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email
No problen, we now have super modern GDPR compliant hagrid, WKD, keybase
and good old pgp.c
https://gist.github.com/rjhansen/67ab921ffb4084c865b3618d6955275f
-Ryan McGinnis
http://bigstormpicture.com
PGP: 486ED7AD
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-us