Re: ProtonMail and Anonymity

> On 9 May 2019, at 22:34, Stefan Claas wrote: > > Am Wed, 8 May 2019 22:08:22 +0200 > schrieb Christopher W. Richardson : > >>> On 6 May 2019, at 16:15, Stefan Claas >> > wrote: >>> >>> ProtonMail's procedure is not anonymous like >>> real anonymous email services >

Re: ProtonMail and Anonymity

On 05/09/2019 01:03 PM, Stefan Claas wrote: > Am Thu, 9 May 2019 15:28:36 -0400 > schrieb Tony Lane : > >> Uhh... no. >> You can absolutely hide the recipient with the '-R' option in Gnupg. >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > > > Sorry for my bad wording! I was refering to the email recipient, wh

Re: ProtonMail and Anonymity

Am Thu, 9 May 2019 15:28:36 -0400 schrieb Tony Lane : > Uhh... no. > You can absolutely hide the recipient with the '-R' option in Gnupg. > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Sorry for my bad wording! I was refering to the email recipient, when using a standard MUA which sends to a regular single ema

Re: ProtonMail and Anonymity

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 5/9/19 10:44 AM, Stefan Claas wrote: > Am Wed, 8 May 2019 18:41:13 -0400 > schrieb Tony Lane : > >> Isn't the whole point of GPG to hide the content or who it's intended >> to? > > Well, yes to hide the content, that is true, but the recipient

Re: ProtonMail and Anonymity

Am Wed, 8 May 2019 18:41:13 -0400 schrieb Tony Lane : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Isn't the whole point of GPG to hide the content or who it's intended > to? Well, yes to hide the content, that is true, but the recipient is known and GnuPG produces the encrypted and armored content in

Re: ProtonMail and Anonymity

Am Wed, 8 May 2019 22:08:22 +0200 schrieb Christopher W. Richardson : > > On 6 May 2019, at 16:15, Stefan Claas > > wrote: > > > > ProtonMail's procedure is not anonymous like > > real anonymous email services > > What are some such “real” anonymous email services? Sc