-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 19 February 2018 at 8:51:08 PM, in a message with no id,
ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote:-
> I think gpgme is the answer here as well. If you mean
> specifically
> a python interface to gpgme then it's probably up to
> a python develop
On 19/02/18 21:54, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> Since symmetric mode of GnuPG uses passphrase stretching, [...]
Obviously I meant key stretching.
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is available at
On 19/02/18 21:06, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> Try symmetric encryption / decryption.
GnuPG uses hybrid encryption. Content is already encrypted with
symmetric encryption, and only the randomly generated symmetric key, 16
or 32 bytes large usually, is encrypted asymmetrically to the recipient,
possib
On Feb 19, 2018 12:45 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> On Sat 2018-02-17 17:06:54 -0600, helices wrote:
> > I will probably never understand why wanting to run the most current
> > version of gnupg on a plethora of servers is controversial.
>
> Here's one last try to explain the situation.
>
>
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Green, Ian wrote:
>
> Can anyone suggest anything to help reduce the time to something more
> viable?
>
Try symmetric encryption / decryption.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/ma
Hi
Firstly, my knowledge of GPG is very weak and I am not a UNIX administrator, so
my access and knowledge are rather limited.
I have been asked to set up file encryption / decryption of files transferred
between our SUN OS servers and two customer's servers.
One customer is using a basic 2048 s
On Sat 2018-02-17 17:06:54 -0600, helices wrote:
> I will probably never understand why wanting to run the most current
> version of gnupg on a plethora of servers is controversial.
Here's one last try to explain the situation.
GnuPG (and the libraries it depends on) are used by (aka "depended on
On 02/19/18 04:53, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:38, konstan...@linuxfoundation.org said:
>
>> (if someone can recommend a better way that only statically links
>> gnupg's own libraries like libassuan and libgpg-error, but uses shared
>> objects for other system libraries, please let
On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:38, konstan...@linuxfoundation.org said:
> (if someone can recommend a better way that only statically links
> gnupg's own libraries like libassuan and libgpg-error, but uses shared
> objects for other system libraries, please let me know, as I didn't find
> any quickie ways
