>You've already heard a lot of good advice from people here
I got a couple of ideas, but so far the only real information is that
I cant do with actual system in place. And one nice idea from a guy to
use level of thrust already implemented, but i'm not sure if i
understand all of its possible dow
> But even if you don't agree with my "vision", lets keep it technical;
> what would be the best way to implement this system in your opinion?
Create a GitHub repo and start committing code.
What you want to do is not something that's within the scope of the
OpenPGP RFC. It's close, but it's not
> Just because they don't expose the dials and switches to you doesn't mean
> they don't exist.
my goal instead is became as invisible as possible for the end user.he
should forget about my app running in the background, of course a
password sometimes when he add a new service, but that is all.
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 14:26, sandhya.sha...@morpho.com said:
> I am using GPG4Win and have to sign data with a specified key through
> my code in C++.But I didn't find much help on how to specify key for
> signing data in GPG
You need to put the signer into the context. See this secion in the
gpgm
Hello,
I am using GPG4Win and have to sign data with a specified key through my code
in C++.But I didn't find much help on how to specify key for signing data in
GPG document.
Please find the below lines of code I am using for signing data:
error = gpgme_op_sign(context,Plaindata,Signdata,GPGME_
On 10/09/17 17:23, lesto fante wrote:
> Now, I have been pointed out that the sanity card in EU (for non EU;
> all EU has the same sanity card.. So you can travel and not have to
> worry) come with a certificate inside!
On 14/09/17 00:20, lesto fante wrote:
> I also hope the same apply on the res
