On December 27, 2016 4:09:35 PM EST, Don Warner Saklad wrote:
>What do you kind folks out there make of comments at
>https://stallman.org/gpg.html
> >"I'm told that key servers carry many phony keys claiming to be
> mine. Here is info about which keys are really mine."
>
> >"Of course, to be rea
Il 27/12/2016 22:09, Don Warner Saklad ha scritto:
> What do you kind folks out there make of comments at
> https://stallman.org/gpg.html
> >"I'm told that key servers carry many phony keys claiming to be
>mine. Here is info about which keys are really mine."
>
> >"Of course, to be really su
> What do you kind folks out there make of comments at
> https://stallman.org/gpg.html
Completely orthodox. Certificates retrieved through the keyserver network
should not be trusted until/unless verified.
Some people are moving to embrace TOFU, which changes these rules somewhat.
For my money,
What do you kind folks out there make of comments at
https://stallman.org/gpg.html
>"I'm told that key servers carry many phony keys claiming to be
mine. Here is info about which keys are really mine."
>"Of course, to be really sure which key is mine, you need to get my
key fingerprint fro
On 12/27/2016 11:16 AM, MFPA wrote:
The --export-secret-subkeys command will do what it says on the tin.
That option would still generate a secret key packet for the primary
key, it's just that this packet would not actually contain any key material.
Here, what has been generated is a file c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Monday 26 December 2016 at 9:21:37 PM, in
, Damien
Goutte-Gattat wrote:-
> As far as I know, the only way to export a subkey
> only is to explicitly
> specify that subkey by its key ID with an appended
> '!',
The --export-secret-subkeys comm
Thanks for the reply. At least I know where things stand now, which is not
a good place :-(
I guess this is another *fine* example of the principle that an
insufficiently tested DR arrangement, will always break down when you need
it.
I'm still puzzled about this partial export, however. I'm quite