Question about GPG versions:
Due to CVE-2016-6313, I put out a new version of Confidant Mail where
the Windows and Mac binaries include GPG 1.4.21.
I also put in a pop-up dialog to warn if someone uses it with a
pre-1.4.21 version of GPG. However, Debian and Tails 2.6rc1
have patched 1.4.18 ins
On Mon 2016-09-05 06:43:30 -0400, A.L.E.C wrote:
> A few users have (different) problems with importing secret keys
> generated by OpenPGP.js. For me it works. Could anyone explain why gpg
> exits with code 2 and what exactly these errors mean?
>
> (gnupg 2.0.28 in this case)
> ERROR: gpg: key FF0A
On 05-09-2016 0:45, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Do I smell a little bit of a Stockholm syndrome here?
>
> The Stockholm syndrome is half-pop science and half-real.
I know what it is. You have obviously worked too much with those forces
in law enforcement that prefer that citizens can't keep any s
A few users have (different) problems with importing secret keys
generated by OpenPGP.js. For me it works. Could anyone explain why gpg
exits with code 2 and what exactly these errors mean?
(gnupg 2.0.28 in this case)
ERROR: gpg: key FF0A6901: secret key imported
ERROR: gpg: assuming bad signature
