On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 21:43, w...@wolfsden.cz said:
> I did some thinking about this and I must admit that I don't see why the
> check is needing at all. In what situation relaxing the check would case
Such a directory may already exist with sufficient permission for any
user to create a socket. A
On , Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 01:58, w...@wolfsden.cz said:
>
> > the building/signing is done in fakeroot environment. Therefore the
> > socket path default to ~/.gnupg/S.gnu-agent. Because (at least it seems
> > to me) in fakeroot I am root (0) and therefore don't own /run/user/1
Hello,
On 07/04/2016 01:36 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 04/07/16 10:10, Muri Nicanor wrote:
>> if i use gpg-agent with ssh-support, is there a way to use the
>> IdentityFile option in ~/.ssh/config? When using ssh-agent i can point
>> IdentityFile to the corresponding private key, but i don't kno
On 04/07/16 10:10, Muri Nicanor wrote:
> if i use gpg-agent with ssh-support, is there a way to use the
> IdentityFile option in ~/.ssh/config? When using ssh-agent i can point
> IdentityFile to the corresponding private key, but i don't know how i
> could do that using gpg-agent (esp. if the key i
Hi all: I'm using gpg 1.4.10. Now I want to
operate it in my program, and I want to get the output info of gpg from popen,
in order that I can process them. Codes like the
following:#include
#include #inc
Hi,
this is actually more a ssh question, but i guess that the likelihood
for someone having the same problem is higher on gnupg-users:
if i use gpg-agent with ssh-support, is there a way to use the
IdentityFile option in ~/.ssh/config? When using ssh-agent i can point
IdentityFile to the corresp
