Re: where is gnupg configure file

2016-03-31 Thread Viktor Dick
Are you sure that you are using gpg2? private-keys-v1.d only contains private keys for gpg2. gpg1 stores them in ~/.gnupg/secring.gpg or something like that. If enigmail uses gpg2 and you created your key with gpg1, they will not see the same keys. '--version' is your friend. IIRC, using the key w

Re: where is gnupg configure file

2016-03-31 Thread mick crane
On 2016-04-01 04:35, Dashamir Hoxha wrote: On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:05 AM, mick crane wrote: First what I would like to do is find a configure file for gnupg ? Did you check ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf ? If it does not exist just create it. Ah OK, so there is no other config file somewhere with pris

Re: where is gnupg configure file

2016-03-31 Thread Dashamir Hoxha
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:05 AM, mick crane wrote: > > First what I would like to do is find a configure file for gnupg ? > Did you check ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf ? If it does not exist just create it. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://l

where is gnupg configure file

2016-03-31 Thread mick crane
hello, I made a key pair a couple of years ago but I never used them. Now I try to make new Debian email server ( just for me ) all nice and tidy. there is enigma plugin for roundmail. I imported my private and public keys and they seem to be in the keyring as "gnupg -K --list-secret-keys" lis

Re: [Announce] GnuPG 2.0.29 released

2016-03-31 Thread Paul R. Ramer
On 03/31/2016 04:12 AM, Werner Koch wrote: > Hello! > > We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG-2.0 > release: Version 2.0.30. This is a maintenance release which fixes a > couple of bugs. The subject line is about v2.0.29 instead of v2.0.30. Just FYI. -Paul

Re: What am I missing? (Again)

2016-03-31 Thread Peter Lebbing
On 31/03/16 09:53, Johan Wevers wrote: >> 2) Is it possible for the user to circumvent the potential problem of the >> device maker cooperating with his adversary to by-pass this protection, >> simply by using a pass-phrase of an appropriate length? Yes/no? > > Yes. Can this be concluded from doc

Re: What am I missing? (Again)

2016-03-31 Thread listo factor
On 03/31/2016 07:53 AM, Johan Wevers - joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl wrote: ... 1) Is it correct... Both apply here: Yes they did design such a device. No, they didn't use... No they didn't use that in this particular model (iPhone 5c). 2) Is it possible for the user to circumvent Yes. Thank y

Re: What am I missing? (Again)

2016-03-31 Thread Chris DeYoung
Let me condense and try again: Let me preface by saying that I am answering based on what I think likely, not what I *know*, so take my comments in that context (and I welcome corrections from anyone who does know, of course). 1) Is it correct that this particular device maker designed a so

[Announce] GnuPG 2.0.29 released

2016-03-31 Thread Werner Koch
Hello! We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG-2.0 release: Version 2.0.30. This is a maintenance release which fixes a couple of bugs. The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is a complete and free implementation of the OpenPGP standard as defined by RFC-4880 and better known as

Re: What am I missing? (Again)

2016-03-31 Thread Johan Wevers
On 31-03-2016 3:41, listo factor wrote: > On 03/30/2016 12:16 PM, listo factor - listofac...@mail.ru wrote: > 1) Is it correct that this particular device maker designed a > sophisticated hardware-based system with the specific purpose of > thwarting the brute-forcing of ridiculously low-entropy u