Re: pubring.kbx, no secring?

2015-12-22 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 15:08, g...@unixarea.de said: > why the new keys of v2 are stored in a dir private-keys-v1.d and not in > a dir for example private-keys-v2.d; don't you think that such name *v1.d* > confuses > people (like me)? You are the first one to comment on this ;-) The new format is a

Re: pubring.kbx, no secring?

2015-12-22 Thread Neal H. Walfield
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 15:08:46 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > El día Tuesday, December 22, 2015 a las 03:03:39PM +0100, Neal H. Walfield > escribió: > > > > Just to make sure: there have been no v1.x keys (I move away the old > > > .gnupg dir), why are the new v2 keys in a dir named > > > .gnup

Re: pubring.kbx, no secring?

2015-12-22 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Tuesday, December 22, 2015 a las 03:03:39PM +0100, Neal H. Walfield escribió: > > Just to make sure: there have been no v1.x keys (I move away the old > > .gnupg dir), why are the new v2 keys in a dir named > > .gnupg/private-keys-v1.d? > > I don't really understand your question, but I'

Re: pubring.kbx, no secring?

2015-12-22 Thread Neal H. Walfield
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:45:59 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Tuesday, December 22, 2015 a las 02:41:24PM +0100, Neal H. Walfield > escribió: > > > Hi Matthias, > > > > On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:28:28 +0100, > > Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > Question: Why I do not have a file .gnupg/secring.kbx

Re: pubring.kbx, no secring?

2015-12-22 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Tuesday, December 22, 2015 a las 02:41:24PM +0100, Neal H. Walfield escribió: > Hi Matthias, > > On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:28:28 +0100, > Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Question: Why I do not have a file .gnupg/secring.kbx (as I have had > > with v1.x)? And, why are the keys stored in .gnupg/priv

Re: pubring.kbx, no secring?

2015-12-22 Thread Neal H. Walfield
Hi Matthias, On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:28:28 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Question: Why I do not have a file .gnupg/secring.kbx (as I have had > with v1.x)? And, why are the keys stored in .gnupg/private-keys-v1.d? The short answer is that we are using a new format. Note: GnuPG 2 will automatical

pubring.kbx, no secring?

2015-12-22 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, I was using GnuPG v1.x mostly to cipher some private files, i.e. not for mail and information exchange with other. I will now create a new key to use this for mail and move to GnuPG v2.x. I have a short question. I created (until now for test) the key like this: $ gpg2 --version gpg (GnuP