On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 22:47:19 +
MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> wrote:
Hello MFPA,
>I suggested he delete my key and re-import it. He tells me he tried
>that twice and it didn't help. It's a mystery to me.
It's the same for me; A re-import of your key still results in an
error(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Tuesday 8 December 2015 at 8:26:23 AM, in
, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> I don't think that GnuPG frontend or gpg-agent doesn't
> emit this error.
> It could be libgcrypt which generates this error.
It seems to be defined in Libgpg-error, which
On 08/12/15 13:16, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> The problem
> is that two software projects want opposite things; this would lead to
> an arms race.
What might be a better "fix", IMHO, would be to have GPA also warn about
this, so people know what to do. Perhaps with another environment
variable GPG_NO_
On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 13:16:29 +0100,
Peter Lebbing wrote:
> Again, no. Lots of programs get vague problems. It's just that it used
> to be that GNOME Keyring said "those problems are in GnuPG", whereas the
> GnuPG project said "those problems are caused by GNOME Keyring breaking
> our software". The
On 08/12/15 00:00, Dark Penguin wrote:
> Erm... sorry, I am still not very good with understanding the bug
> report flow; I would have checked the Debian GPA bug page before
> writing here if I knew about its existence. ^_^' And yes, here it is,
> my "Unsupported certificate" bug!..
No problem, it
Is it possible to import public keys into GPA by "opening them with GPA"
instead of using "Keys - Import"?.. That would sure be convenient, but
simply opening an .asc key with GPA did not do that, and I couldn't find
anything mentioning such thing in the man gpa.
If this functionality is indee
I am sure I've installed all updates and security-updates. I wanted to
confirm the existence of another bug, so I've upgraded everything.
Debian has gpg installed by default; I did not run it before installing
GPA - naturally, I would expect GPA to run it itself if it needs it.
Also, in Debian
On 12/08/2015 08:51 AM, MFPA wrote:
> What does the error message "gpg: Can't check signature: Broken public
> key" mean?
>
> One of the members of PGPNET reports getting that error
> message when verifying the signatures on my signed and encrypted
> messages to the group. He gets it for the signa
