On 18/11/15 16:59, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> 0x5E5CCCB4A4BF43D7 has expired - that's the only thing "bad" about it.
I could not reproduce this:
> $ gpg2 -k 2C53B2ED
> pub rsa2048/2C53B2ED 2015-08-21 [expired: 2015-08-28]
> uid [ expired] Test Teststra Jr.
> $ gpg2 --check-sig DCDFDFA4
On 18/11/15 13:53, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> I downloaded the key and all sub-keys. Neither GPA Kgpg or Kleopatra give
> any warnings
> about this key. You don't say what's bad about it - which is why your not
> getting much help
> here.
Actually, I understand what he means, I just don't know h
On 16/11/15 15:01, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my key is not bad, the signature by 0x5E5CCCB4A4BF43D7 is bad. The
> question is why.
>
> Regards
>
> Sebastian
>
Hello Sebastian,
I downloaded the key and all sub-keys. Neither GPA Kgpg or Kleopatra give any
warnings
about this ke
On 17/11/15 15:33, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
>> https://alexcabal.com/creating-the-perfect-gpg-keypair/
>
> This is a fairly good article - I've used it myself for reference in the
> past. Also have a look at:
I disagree, I'd recommend people not to read that article, let alone
follow its advice.
