Hi,
i've googled a lot and i guess it is just not possible but i want to ask
this list before giving up.
Is it possible to create (and verify) PKCS1_PSS signatures with gpg that
are compatible with openssl?
The signatures are created with this commands:
# Generate keys
openssl genrsa -out p
> If that was what he meant to say, he didn't say it.
Peter's right, and you're moving the goalposts. Please stop.
> So, I'll make my question more general. Is anyone aware of a case in
> which the validity or enforceability of an OpenPGP signature has been
> argued?
To repeat my answer: yes.
"Peter Lebbing" wrote:
> On 04/10/15 17:04, joe.asmod...@sigaint.org wrote:
>> Therefore, I agree that a blanket holding that all digital
>> signatures are non-repudiable is unlikely.
>
> I think you're moving the goal posts. I think Rob says that he's unaware
> of any
> case where a specific digi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Everyone,
I'm not sure how but I somehow set the expiration date of my
encryption key and my signing key to different dates (different by a
few months time). While I know this isn't "really" a problem, I just
like to have both keys expire on t
On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:23:28 -0400
Crissy Lynn wrote:
>Please! For the 600th time! REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST!
You have been asking how to unsubscribe and many participants on
this mailing list have answered you. However, the theory has
been proposed that you are not reading the list and h
On Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:55:49 +0200
Peter Lebbing wrote:
Hello Peter,
>equally disrespectful if I hadn't been one of the people at least
>trying.
Whilst it's laudable that people try and help her, I doubt she's even
_reading_ stuff from the list any more. *Seeing* it, yes (obviously).
As such,
Hello Peter,
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Peter Lebbing
wrote:
> I personally
> find this statement disrespectful to the people who tried to help miss
> Lynn,
> when she is not very approachable and offers no more explanation as to
> why she can't just unsubscribe than the following
>
you ce
On 04/10/15 20:05, Richard Höchenberger wrote:
> I find the repeated explanations of how to unsubscribe extremely unhelpful,
> bordering to disrespect, since it does not provide the kind of help this
> users needs.
Even though I might share your sentiment on the rest of your mail, I personally
fin
On 04/10/15 17:04, joe.asmod...@sigaint.org wrote:
> Therefore, I agree that a blanket holding that all digital
> signatures are non-repudiable is unlikely.
I think you're moving the goal posts. I think Rob says that he's unaware of any
case where a specific digital signature was argued to be non-
Hello everyone,
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Crissy Lynn
wrote:
> Please! For the 600th time! REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST!
so for whatever reason, this user is obviously unable to successfully
unsubscribe from this mailing list. Will not any of the list
admins/moderators have mercy and
Quoting Don Saklad (2015-10-04 16:30:50)
> How can it be made even easier!?
CryptoParties are a good start from an educational standpoint.
Whiteout.io and Pixelated are a good start from a technological
standpoint.
https://www.cryptoparty.in/location
https://www.cryptoparty.in/parties/upcoming
h
How can it be made even easier!?
Trying to encourage M.D.'s to use it is met with complaints about not
having time to learn about it. Set up is a too complicated sequence of
steps that aren't entirely clear. The steps can get hampered where there
aren't instructions that cover what to do when one
"Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
> Yes, many! Digital signatures are enforceable in U.S. courts.
>
> Non-repudiability, though, as far as I know has never been successfully
> argued. More to the point, I don't think it could be.
I assume that enforcebility is determined using the standards applied to
On 10/02/2015 06:55 PM, Faramir wrote:
> ...
> Well, you don't really need your key signed for that... at least,
> not the key with your name on it. You can make a key using the name
> "mysoftwarename distribution key", and use it to sign the files. Once
> people start using the software, they ma
> Are you aware of a court, anywhere in the world, which has considered the
> issue?
Yes, many! Digital signatures are enforceable in U.S. courts.
Non-repudiability, though, as far as I know has never been successfully
argued. More to the point, I don't think it could be.
"Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
> The idea that OpenPGP signatures are non-repudiable is a fashionable bit
> of nonsense: I am aware of no court, anywhere in the world, which has
> recognized OpenPGP signatures as being non-repudiable.
>
Are you aware of a court, anywhere in the world, which has consid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Saturday 3 October 2015 at 11:53:26 PM, in
, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> If I commit a crime and it gets traced back to the
> certificate we shared, then the authorities would have
> to figure out which of us was using the certificate.
This ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Saturday 3 October 2015 at 1:04:55 PM, in
,
Guan Xin wrote:
> The word "will" does not infer history.
No, but talking about something that happened in the past does. (-;
> You know by
> reputation I meant personal reputation,
It was clear
18 matches
Mail list logo
