-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 30-09-2015 a las 14:17, David Niklas escribió:
> Hello,
Hello,
> Now, I'm a student (think penny less), and live in a rural area
> 100mi from the nearest LUG and people out here are _very_ computer
> illiterate
Well, I live in the capital
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 01-10-2015 a las 8:08, Bob Henson escribió:
...
>> It /is/ totally meaningless. And we should educate users that it
>> is meaningless.
>
> Agreed. But a new user who has yet to be educated would baulk at
> trusting a key signed by Genghis Khan o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 01-10-2015 a las 5:33, Bob Henson escribió:
...
> Authority key, say. But a signature of any person's key that you
> have not met and positively verified is worse than useless as it
> degrades the whole trust process. Someone who I had never
> pre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 01-10-2015 a las 7:26, Christian Loehle escribió:
> I want to use gpg to encrypt a potentially large file to some
> (cloud-like) storage provider, the recipients are not known at the
> time of uploading. What I want to do is to send the encrypted
Hi Daniel!
On 2015-09-29, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Fri 2015-09-25 00:49:48 -0700, Jens Lechtenboerger wrote:
>
>> I tried to generate test keys with expired user IDs (under faked
>> system time), but I failed, with gpg 1.4 as well as 2.1.8.
>
> with 2.1.8, i get an expiration prompt for th
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Anthony Papillion
wrote:
>
> Sorry to just jump in here but I've been following the conversation
> and this caught my eye. While checking the email address associated
> with a key might not /always/ be useful (like in the case of IM, fax,
> etc), it /can/ help provi
Thanks for your reply(and all the others of course).
Personally I'm going to use non-pgp AES probably, although I'm not quite
content with that. As I said, this seems like a feature that would make
sense, I might work on it myself if I find the time.
--
Christian Loehle
On 10/01/2015 07:29 PM, Da
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:29, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
> So the only functionality GnuPG is missing to assemble the workflow
> you're describing would be a new GnuPG command named something like
> --generate-pkesk-with-session-key. If that command was available, the
A more generalized version w
