On 7/23/2015 at 2:58 PM, "A.T. Leibson" wrote:
>Do people (other than John Young) still use PGP? Why would someone
>want to do that?
=
The only possible reasons I can think of are:
[1] Remailer use,
Original remailers used PGP 2.x and even though some use GnuPG, others are
reluctant
-Original Message-
From: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org]
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 4:24 AM
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:11, sbut...@fchn.com said:
> This is a snippet of the script I use to decrypt any file coming to me that
> has my private key (or my companies private key)
>
> $DFLT
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:11, sbut...@fchn.com said:
> This is a snippet of the script I use to decrypt any file coming to me that
> has my private key (or my companies private key)
>
> $DFLT gpg_pass2 \
> | gpg --homedir $homedir --quiet --passphrase-fd 0 --no-tty --skip-verify \
> --no-
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:13, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
> 1. PGP 2.6 is *small*. The original PGP specification (RFC1991) is a
> small fraction of the size of the modern OpenPGP specification
> (RFC4880). When it comes to trustworthy code, small is beautiful.
FWIW, RFC-1991 is not a complete spe
David Carter wrote:
> We currently use Gnupg 1.4.10
>
> This is a sample of how we would call
> gpg to encrypt a text file prior to transmission:
>
> gpg -c -o DataFile.gpg --batch --compress-algo 1 --cipher-algocast5
> --passphrase KeyValue DataFile.txt
>
> The files that we receive share
