On 2015-06-02 05:28, MFPA wrote:
> Not convinced I would trust such an app on *any* website.
It would be rather naïve to do so, indeed.
> Would the suggestion be to upload a plain vanilla key not used
> elsewhere, that has made and gathered no certifications?
This is exactly what I have done i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On June 1, 2015 7:20:33 PM EDT, ant...@blazrsoft.com wrote:
>I don't see any harm in it. I uploaded my public key and they verified
>that I could decrypt it by a link in an encrypted email. 5 whole
>seconds out of my day to get encrypted emails from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I don't see any harm in it. I uploaded my public key and they verified that I
could decrypt it by a link in an encrypted email. 5 whole seconds out of my day
to get encrypted emails from Facebook. They now have information that was
publicly availa
On June 1, 2015 5:43:10 PM EDT, Jerry wrote:
>On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 22:17:33 +0200, Einar Ryeng stated:
>
>> > A comment worth reading in case one does not see it oneself IMHO:
>> >
>https://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/2015/06/01/facebook-offers-to-send-you-encrypted-emails-this-wont-help-you/
>
>>
>>
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 22:17:33 +0200, Einar Ryeng stated:
> > A comment worth reading in case one does not see it oneself IMHO:
> > https://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/2015/06/01/facebook-offers-to-send-you-encrypted-emails-this-wont-help-you/
> >
>
> Well, that comment seems to identify the two main
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 06:37:33PM +0200, gnupg-us...@henk.geekmail.org wrote:
>
> A comment worth reading in case one does not see it oneself IMHO:
> https://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/2015/06/01/facebook-offers-to-send-you-encrypted-emails-this-wont-help-you/
Well, that comment seems to identify th
I already have a working GnuPG which is under the subtree /usr/local.
I would like to build and test the last one (2.0.27) starting on an
independant subtree:
/local/gpg2
I have started by downloading libgpg-error-1.19
cd libgpg-error-1.19
./configure --prefix=/local/gp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Monday 1 June 2015 at 6:18:52 PM, in
, Jason Antony wrote:
> But would you trust that app? :-)
Not convinced I would trust such an app on *any* website.
Would the suggestion be to upload a plain vanilla key not used
elsewhere, that has made
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Monday 1 June 2015 at 5:37:33 PM, in
,
gnupg-us...@henk.geekmail.org wrote:
> A comment worth reading in case one does not see it
> oneself IMHO:
> https://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/2015/06/01/facebook-offers-to-send-you-encrypted-emails-this-won
On 2015-06-02 02:17, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> Now we just need a facebook app to generate keys ...
But would you trust that app? :-)
-- Jason
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
ht
Hi
On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 10:30:59 -0400
"Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
> Facebook has just this morning announced limited support for OpenPGP.
> At present, it's limited to allowing users to upload an OpenPGP
> certificate, and Facebook using that certificate to encrypt all email
> communications betwe
On 1 June 2015 at 16:30, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Facebook has just this morning announced limited support for OpenPGP.
> At present, it's limited to allowing users to upload an OpenPGP
> certificate, and Facebook using that certificate to encrypt all email
> communications between Facebook and
Apparently, some people are having trouble finding Facebook's public
announcement. See the following:
https://www.facebook.com/notes/protect-the-graph/securing-email-communications-from-facebook/1611941762379302
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
Facebook has just this morning announced limited support for OpenPGP.
At present, it's limited to allowing users to upload an OpenPGP
certificate, and Facebook using that certificate to encrypt all email
communications between Facebook and the user.
It's a small step forwards, but an exceptionally
14 matches
Mail list logo
