On 04/14/2015 12:07 PM, jason zhang wrote:
> Yes, it asked me the passphrase just after "gpg: CAST5 encrypted data"
> line, and I gave the passphrase. The passphrase is definitely right since I
> used it very 2 or 3 days.
I see.
> Here is a whole debug session:
Thank you for the log.
> gpg: DBG
Here are the output from "file" and "gpg --list-packets"
[jason@f15 ~]$ file .jsbk.gpg
.jsbk.gpg: DOS executable (COM)
[jason@f15 ~]$ gpg --list-packets .jsbk.gpg
:symkey enc packet: version 4, cipher 3, s2k 3, hash 2
salt 51c310499a629643, count 65536 (96)
gpg: CAST5 encrypted data
:encrypted
On 4/13/15 8:56 PM, jason zhang wrote:
Hi Doug
Yes, the problem started after the unscheduled shutdown. Unfortunately,
I don't have an archived version. The problem is that another
encrypted, which I have not touched for sometime, cann't be opened either.
Well I'm sorry to say, that sounds lik
Hi Doug
Yes, the problem started after the unscheduled shutdown. Unfortunately, I
don't have an archived version. The problem is that another encrypted,
which I have not touched for sometime, cann't be opened either.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 4/13/15 8:07 PM, jas
On 4/13/15 8:07 PM, jason zhang wrote:
Hi NIIBE
Thank you very much for the help.
Yes, it asked me the passphrase just after "gpg: CAST5 encrypted data"
line, and I gave the passphrase. The passphrase is definitely right
since I used it very 2 or 3 days.
You mentioned that you had an unschedu
Hi NIIBE
Thank you very much for the help.
Yes, it asked me the passphrase just after "gpg: CAST5 encrypted data"
line, and I gave the passphrase. The passphrase is definitely right since I
used it very 2 or 3 days.
Here is a whole debug session:
On 04/14/2015 07:27 AM, jason zhang wrote:
> Any clue? Where should I start to investigate?
>
> I checked another encrypted file. I cloud not decrypt it, either.
> But I can encrypt /decrypt new file successfully.
Please let us know your configuration. I think that it's
~/.gnupg/gpg.conf on Fedo
On 04/14/2015 04:23 AM, Ivan Markin wrote:
> On 04/13/2015 07:37 PM, Werner Koch wrote:> On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 23:01,
> ivansun...@gmail.com said:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I'm using OpenPGP card to store my secret keys on it. Now I'm
>>> adding a new UID to my key by running gpg2 --edit-key. What I've
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Monday 13 April 2015 at 7:12:52 PM, in
, Werner Koch wrote:
> A Pinentry is not provided so to avoid dependency
> problems with the Gtk+ or Qt+ libraries. It would have
> been possible to include a simple Windows pinentry and
> thus avoid de
Any clue? Where should I start to investigate?
I checked another encrypted file. I cloud not decrypt it, either.
But I can encrypt /decrypt new file successfully.
I remembered my laptop was shut down abruptly due to out of power while I
edit the file in email. Could this cause the problem?
Thank
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/13/2015 07:37 PM, Werner Koch wrote:> On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 23:01,
ivansun...@gmail.com said:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'm using OpenPGP card to store my secret keys on it. Now I'm
>> adding a new UID to my key by running gpg2 --edit-key. What I've
>> go
Hi,
I just uploaded an _experimental_ Windows installer with GnuPG 2.1.3:
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/binary/gnupg-w32-2.1.3_20150413.exe (2539k)
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/binary/gnupg-w32-2.1.3_20150413.exe.sig
The exe has a SHA-1 checksum of
d5630904b3d68eddc2730a00bfc67d52658cbe7e gnupg-
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 23:01, ivansun...@gmail.com said:
> Hello!
>
> I'm using OpenPGP card to store my secret keys on it. Now I'm adding a
> new UID to my key by running gpg2 --edit-key. What I've got is this
You need to insert your card to create a new UID.
> gpg: secret key parts are not availab
On 08/04/15 20:57, Jan Svensson wrote:
> What do you think about me trying to use Libgcrypt instead?
Personally, if I was actually going to use the program, I wouldn't write
it myself. I'd only write it myself if it was purely for the learning
experience.
I'd look for an existing project that mak
Hi Ethan,
Thanks for the quick replies today, appreciate those.
You're correct on GNU's GCC, in that it compiles successfully. It looks
like I labelled one of my Clang compiles "GCC_Comp1.txt" last night
accidentally and looked for the error rather than double checking the
compiler to make sure I
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 00:29, dominyktil...@gmail.com said:
> =
> t-stringhelp.c:488:3: error: function definition is not allowed here
> {
> ^
Oh sorry, I didn't spotted the use of a nested function here.
Fix pushed and attsched.
Salam-Sh
16 matches
Mail list logo
